Search for: "MATTER OF P S"
Results 7461 - 7480
of 18,883
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Feb 2016, 1:26 pm
Trustee which oversees such matters and litigated the matter. [read post]
24 Feb 2016, 12:48 pm
The Admin Court held: Via R. v Camden LBC Ex p. [read post]
24 Feb 2016, 9:03 am
It’s very hard to understand why there was no effective and efficient challenge on the merits to AC’s application, including a challenge to the Board’s original interim tariff. [read post]
24 Feb 2016, 8:55 am
On February 9, 2016, Judge Frederick P. [read post]
24 Feb 2016, 4:00 am
Google Inc., 2015 BCCA 265 [3] Google contends that the injunction ought not to have been granted because the application did not have a sufficient connection to the Province to give the Supreme Court of British Columbia competence to deal with the matter. [read post]
24 Feb 2016, 3:15 am
As an initial matter, the Court held that Nalco’s arguments that defendants’ Section 45 tax credits – obtained for selling refined coal – did not sufficiently prove defendants’ direct infringement or control. [read post]
23 Feb 2016, 7:36 am
Jones agreed to a cease and desist order as well as censure and a $75,000 penalty arising from the Commission’s charges that the firm violated Regulation S-P by “entirely” failing to have policies in place in advance of a data breach where sensitive client information that was stored on a third party web server was hacked); (2) cases where material confidential information has been stolen for the purpose of illegal trading or market manipulation (citing a… [read post]
22 Feb 2016, 10:49 pm
Mr Nuon’s condition deteriorated and he was considered catastrophic requiring high care. [read post]
22 Feb 2016, 5:30 am
” See Baltzley at p. 3 [citation omitted]. [read post]
21 Feb 2016, 9:06 pm
Lincoln P. [read post]
19 Feb 2016, 4:08 pm
It’s the hole they were intended to and can in fact fill: protecting useful articles with some visual content that matters. [read post]
19 Feb 2016, 11:57 am
[Plaintiff’s] interpretation of Connecticut’s registration statute is expansive. [read post]
18 Feb 2016, 10:59 am
Courtside: High Court ’89 Highlights and Highjinks, Legal Times, DEC. 18 & 25, p. 8, 1989). [read post]
18 Feb 2016, 6:17 am
Spelling-Goldberg Prods., 603 P.2d 454, 455 (Cal. 1979). [read post]
18 Feb 2016, 5:00 am
Firemark.Entertainment Law Offices of Gordon P. [read post]
17 Feb 2016, 9:20 am
Bancorp, et al., No. 15-591 (Whether subject matter eligibility under 35 U.S.C. [read post]
17 Feb 2016, 8:38 am
“It really doesn’t matter what they’re called. [read post]
16 Feb 2016, 1:45 pm
The Senate Report (114-74, p. 29) asserts that “[s]trict and exclusive use of statistical significance tests effectively requires contractors to use a quota hiring system in violation of the Civil Rights Act to avoid adverse impact claims by OFCCP. [read post]
16 Feb 2016, 9:00 am
Id., p. 11. [read post]
16 Feb 2016, 7:25 am
The court of appeals affirmed the dismissal of the Lanham Act claim because the challenged statements were puffery as a matter of law. [read post]
