Search for: "Matter of Rules Adoption"
Results 7461 - 7480
of 22,052
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Jan 2019, 2:34 pm
If so, the court must honor the delegation clause and refer the matter to arbitration. [read post]
17 Jan 2019, 9:02 am
(Ethics Council Recommendation) The Ethics Council thus appears to be working toward the construction of a set of rules of responsibility grounded in the presumption of shared responsibility which is triggered by notions of control. [read post]
17 Jan 2019, 4:00 am
TOROG TOROG unites a number of research and transactional lawyers from Toronto law firms and banks who consider matters that create issues in legal opinions. [read post]
16 Jan 2019, 5:15 pm
Kagan came to the bench with a somewhat different take on the matter, appearing strongly predisposed to rule against Home Depot because the initial complaint in this case (filed by Citibank) did not institute a “civil action” over which federal courts would “have original jurisdiction. [read post]
16 Jan 2019, 12:30 pm
” SBA rejected that comment in the following response: SBA does not adopt this comment. [read post]
16 Jan 2019, 10:52 am
Finally, the chief justice returned the argument to administrative law matters, raising the age [read post]
16 Jan 2019, 8:15 am
The CFPB states that the report does not include a cost-benefit analysis of the ATR/QM Rule or its provisions, but that “each report does address matters relating to the costs and benefits. [read post]
15 Jan 2019, 7:41 pm
It ultimately chose not to exercise its discretion to rule against Petitioner for that failure because the Petitioner belatedly filed the record with the court. [read post]
15 Jan 2019, 2:48 pm
Beaver County Employees Retirement Fund (“Cyan”), ruling unanimously that, class actions under the ’33 Act (1) may be brought in state court pursuant to SLUSA, and (2) are not removable to federal court. [read post]
15 Jan 2019, 1:24 pm
New Prime involves an exception to the rule in the Federal Arbitration Act that obligates courts to enforce arbitration agreements that involve interstate commerce. [read post]
15 Jan 2019, 8:46 am
In the end, the degree of connection did not matter. [read post]
14 Jan 2019, 9:17 pm
Later this year we will probably find out what the Seventh and Ninth Circuits think about the issue, but unless and until the United States Supreme Court rules on the matter it will remain the subject of argument and disagreement, something that provides both benefits and risks for businesses sued under the ADA. [read post]
14 Jan 2019, 1:53 pm
Even within the 6th and 7th circuits, there is no harmony in the view adopted and there has been a multitude of opinions flowing as to which is the most appropriate and intended one. [read post]
14 Jan 2019, 11:59 am
It adopted a resolution making detailed findings in support of the design review approval, finding the project consistent with the general plan’s infill development and housing goals, and finding the Class 32 CEQA categorical exemption applied consistent with the City Attorney’s advice, which indicated that even if the exemption did not apply the City’s discretion – and consequently the scope of CEQA review – was still limited due to the absence of a CUP… [read post]
14 Jan 2019, 11:39 am
These forums are an opportunity to provide input to the attorney general prior to publication of the proposed rules, and BakerHostetler will be actively participating throughout the public comment and subsequent rulemaking process. [read post]
14 Jan 2019, 10:00 am
Second, the court adopted a proportionality test vis-à-vis the demolition order. [read post]
14 Jan 2019, 9:20 am
Does this lack of awareness matter? [read post]
14 Jan 2019, 7:12 am
Rather, public support such as grants, tax benefits, and other measures should come from general revenues as a matter of public policy, not through cross-subsidization. [read post]
14 Jan 2019, 6:46 am
In the Matter of the Adoption of K.A.H., 2015-Ohio-1971 (10th Dist.) [read post]
14 Jan 2019, 6:43 am
Main Street Adoption Servs., LLP, 633 F.3d 496, 507 (6th Cir. 2011); Qualcomm, Inc. v. [read post]
