Search for: "Peter v. Peter" Results 7461 - 7480 of 8,635
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Sep 2009, 3:00 am
[This is the eleventh in a series of posts by CrimProf's graduate fellow, Peter Stockburger (University of San Diego Class of 2009), previewing the criminal law and procedure cases scheduled for argument in the U.S. [read post]
31 Aug 2009, 7:25 pm
Jude Medical (IP Frontline) (PatLit) District Court N D California grants summary judgment of invalidity based on on-sale bar: PartsRiver, Inc v Shopzilla, Inc et al (EDTexweblog.com) District Court N D Illinois: Subjective colours require definition to avoid indefiniteness: On the First Ltd v Seiko Epson Corp (Chicago Intellectual Property Law Blog) Supreme Court asked to hear Medela AG v Kinetic Concepts, Inc – Should obviousness be determined by the court or… [read post]
31 Aug 2009, 3:00 am
[This is the tenth in a series of posts by CrimProf's graduate fellow, Peter Stockburger (University of San Diego Class of 2009), previewing the criminal law and procedure cases scheduled for argument in the U.S. [read post]
29 Aug 2009, 10:47 pm
Though this case, Phillips v Eyre, was mainly concerned with constitutional issues, Willes J laid down a rule for choice of law in tort which endured for nearly a century before it was finally superseded. [read post]
29 Aug 2009, 3:05 pm
Earlier this year, I described a lawsuit that was just filed: Michael Jacobs v. [read post]
29 Aug 2009, 9:47 am
[This is the ninth in a series of posts by CrimProf's graduate fellow, Peter Stockburger (University of San Diego Class of 2009), previewing the criminal law and procedure cases scheduled for argument in the U.S. [read post]
28 Aug 2009, 3:10 am
[This is the eighth in a series of posts by CrimProf's graduate fellow, Peter Stockburger (University of San Diego Class of 2009), previewing the criminal law and procedure cases scheduled for argument in the U.S. [read post]
27 Aug 2009, 2:47 pm by justinsilverman
I was not charged with the crime set forth in the advertisements.” Coronado and the others identified in the ad are now the plaintiffs in Freedom Communications, Inc. v. [read post]
27 Aug 2009, 10:05 am
[This is the seventh in a series of posts by CrimProf's graduate fellow, Peter Stockburger (University of San Diego Class of 2009), previewing the criminal law and procedure cases scheduled for argument in the U.S. [read post]
27 Aug 2009, 3:00 am
[This is the sixth in a series of posts by CrimProf's graduate fellow, Peter Stockburger (University of San Diego Class of 2009), previewing the criminal law and procedure cases scheduled for argument in the U.S. [read post]
26 Aug 2009, 10:02 am
[This is the fifth in a series of posts by CrimProf's graduate fellow, Peter Stockburger (University of San Diego Class of 2009), previewing the criminal law and procedure cases scheduled for argument in the U.S. [read post]
26 Aug 2009, 3:02 am
[This is the fourth in a series of posts by CrimProf's graduate fellow, Peter Stockburger (University of San Diego Class of 2009), previewing the criminal law and procedure cases scheduled for argument in the U.S. [read post]
25 Aug 2009, 10:05 am
[This is the third in a series of posts by CrimProf's graduate fellow, Peter Stockburger (University of San Diego Class of 2009), previewing the criminal law and procedure cases scheduled for argument in the U.S. [read post]
25 Aug 2009, 7:05 am
(Editor’s Note: This essay was written by Robert Monks and Harvard Law School Visiting Professor Peter Murray.) [read post]
25 Aug 2009, 3:05 am
[This is the second in a series of posts by CrimProf's graduate fellow, Peter Stockburger (University of San Diego Class of 2009), previewing the criminal law and procedure cases scheduled for argument in the U.S. [read post]
24 Aug 2009, 10:43 am
[This is the first in a series of posts by CrimProf's graduate fellow, Peter Stockburger (University of San Diego Class of 2009), previewing the criminal law and procedure cases scheduled for argument in the U.S. [read post]