Search for: "State v. C. S. S. B."
Results 7461 - 7480
of 15,316
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 May 2015, 2:13 pm
The State Legislature in liberalizing the statutes to effect greater protection to the victims of domestic violence by enactment of L.1980, c. 530, is deemed cognizant that Family Court is a non-jury institution wherein the court sits as both finder of fact and of law. [read post]
25 May 2015, 2:13 pm
The State Legislature in liberalizing the statutes to effect greater protection to the victims of domestic violence by enactment of L.1980, c. 530, is deemed cognizant that Family Court is a non-jury institution wherein the court sits as both finder of fact and of law. [read post]
24 May 2015, 4:35 pm
Troxel v. [read post]
23 May 2015, 9:00 pm
., Petitioner, v. [read post]
22 May 2015, 1:00 pm
State ex rel. [read post]
22 May 2015, 7:02 am
(b) By regulation, the IRS ruled that the two-year limitations period on requests for mandatory innocent spouse relief under § 6015(b) and (c) also applies to § 6015(f). [read post]
22 May 2015, 4:08 am
Int’l, Inc. v. [read post]
21 May 2015, 12:22 pm
Supreme Court decided United States v. [read post]
20 May 2015, 1:39 pm
ITS asserts that James engaged in a conspiracy to solicit away and convert (a) ITS' office employees at the Knox location, (b) at least the active ITS field employees servicing the Knox location, and (c) customers comprising the Knox-area business. [read post]
19 May 2015, 5:52 pm
In support of her position, B has asked the court to consider the case of Hines v. [read post]
19 May 2015, 12:24 pm
State v. [read post]
19 May 2015, 6:32 am
Similar to federal law, the KCRA defines “disability” as: (a) a physical or mental impairment that substantially limits one or more of the major life activities of the individual; (b) a record of such impairment; or (c) being regarded as having such an impairment. [read post]
18 May 2015, 10:37 am
Last month, the Supreme Court of North Carolina decided State v. [read post]
18 May 2015, 7:29 am
(d) Summary of Rationale: The state court’s divorce decree did not meet any of the requirements for a QDRO. [read post]
18 May 2015, 5:42 am
§ 1.170A-13(c)(4)(i)(B), because it had serious doubts about the taxpayer’s ability to take a charitable contribution deduction. [read post]
18 May 2015, 5:42 am
§ 1.170A-13(c)(4)(i)(B), because it had serious doubts about the taxpayer’s ability to take a charitable contribution deduction. [read post]
17 May 2015, 10:02 pm
Policy debate If a firm that performs steps A, B, and C of a "method" patent induces the firm's customers to take step D -- the final one -- does the firm infringe the patent? [read post]
16 May 2015, 1:37 pm
C. [read post]
15 May 2015, 4:27 pm
The key threshold to meet in asking a court to grant such injunctions is that they can prevent both existing infringement and future infringement provided they are “effective, proportionate and dissuasive” (L’Oreal v eBay (2011 ECJ Case C-324-09). [read post]
14 May 2015, 7:04 pm
(Pix (c) Larry Catá Backer 2015) Sexual Assault has been much in the news in the United States. [read post]
