Search for: "State v. Land"
Results 7461 - 7480
of 13,268
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Apr 2015, 5:28 am
See, Bennett v. [read post]
22 Apr 2022, 4:23 pm
This means liberals must abandon Roe v. [read post]
31 May 2012, 10:00 am
In Deanza Assoc. v. [read post]
21 Apr 2012, 8:00 am
The recent California decision in Gravelin v. [read post]
27 Apr 2010, 11:14 am
More importantly, the ruling in Jerman v. [read post]
15 Apr 2016, 6:44 am
Over forty years ago, it insists, the Court’s decision in United States v. [read post]
20 Feb 2017, 3:04 am
In Woodgett v. [read post]
24 Mar 2012, 4:49 pm
This is the crux of the three petitions for review: how could a simple obiter dictum (a remark made as an aside, in the course of a decision) suddenly become the law of the land, sufficient to override all state and local laws to the contrary? [read post]
27 Aug 2008, 6:01 am
In 1827, Ralph Waldo Emerson found Tallahassee “a grotesque place . . . settled by public officers, land speculators, and desperadoes. [read post]
14 May 2019, 3:22 am
Wade may soon no longer be the law of the land. [read post]
15 Jul 2010, 6:53 am
Waters v. [read post]
13 Jul 2017, 12:06 pm
Animal Legal Defense Fund v. [read post]
12 Oct 2007, 3:36 am
Case Name: Betty Mathisen, Harold Shipley, Patricia Brown, Vicki Ruiz, Bobby Shipley, Jr., Jimmy Shipley, Monica Miller and Robin Shipley v. [read post]
22 Jun 2010, 9:19 am
On June 17, 2010, in Ontario v. [read post]
9 Dec 2021, 10:11 am
See United States v. [read post]
11 Oct 2007, 9:42 am
The Supreme Court granted a Writ of Certiorari on March 26, 2007 in the case of Stoneridge Investment Partners LLC v. [read post]
18 Jun 2012, 7:38 pm
The decisions are In re: New Jersey Title Insurance Litigation, 2012-1 Trade Cases ¶77,921 and McCray v. [read post]
12 Sep 2015, 10:08 pm
Mireabella v Villard, 2015 WL 4886439 (ED PA 8/17/2015)Filed under: Current Caselaw, Retaliation, Section 1983 Liability [read post]
24 Mar 2025, 12:15 am
In JCCrandall, LLC v. [read post]
7 Oct 2011, 3:18 pm
American Atheists (relisted after the 9/26 Conference) Docket: 10-1297 Issue(s): (1) What is the appropriate test for evaluating whether a passive display with religious imagery violates the Establishment Clause; (2) whether this Court should set aside the “endorsement test” in favor of the “coercion test”; and (3) whether a memorial cross placed on state land by a private organization to commemorate fallen state troopers is an… [read post]
