Search for: "State v. Person" Results 7461 - 7480 of 76,236
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Aug 2011, 8:58 am by Fenella Keymer, Olswang LLP
  The contract expressly stated that the relationship between the parties was that of client and independent contractor. [read post]
8 Jul 2024, 1:09 pm
It's got tons of details about the defendant's life, the crime, the procedural complexities of the trial, the attitude of the state court judge and their rulings, etc. [read post]
9 Apr 2024, 1:18 pm
Pretty much everyone -- including but not limited to Earl Warren to Stanley Mosk -- thought that California didn't allow one person to run for two different offices at the same election.But the Court of Appeal decides today that that's wrong; that one person can, indeed, run for multiple offices if s/he so decides. [read post]
6 Nov 2015, 12:33 pm
 Justice Benke rightly holds that he's got the requisite minimum contacts because he owns real property in California and the dispute (the fraudulent conveyance action) arose out of those contacts with the forum.Footnote three, however, tangentially notes that defendant also owns other real property in California that did not give rise to the fraudulent conveyance action, and then cites the Supreme Court's opinion in McGee as indicating that even a single contact with the… [read post]
10 May 2010, 11:23 pm by Orin Kerr
No, said the Third Circuit in United States v. [read post]
29 May 2015, 3:51 am by Amy Howe
Abbott, the Texas “one person, one vote” case, “because for nearly half a century, the Aloha State has had the high court’s permission to ignore transients when drawing its political maps. [read post]