Search for: "State v. Plan"
Results 7461 - 7480
of 29,606
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Sep 2019, 4:00 am
” [v] Finally, as illustrated with the anecdote with my friend, going thru this planning process with a lawyer leaves a person thinking that they have done their advance care planning and that there’s nothing left to do (see Figure). [read post]
24 Sep 2019, 10:00 am
United States and McDonnell v. [read post]
23 Sep 2019, 11:38 am
As we have previously reported, in April 2018, the California Supreme Court issued a sweeping ruling in Dynamex Operations West, Inc. v. [read post]
23 Sep 2019, 8:15 am
Wade by passing draconian bans on abortion at the state level. [read post]
23 Sep 2019, 5:01 am
He plans to write further about the case, but would like to be able to avoid having to make such assumptions in his future writing. [read post]
23 Sep 2019, 3:25 am
A view from the Mary Quantexhibition at the V&AOn Monday evening, the Victoria & Albert Museum saw over two-thousand attendees pour through its marble and tiled halls for AIPPI's Cultural Evening. [read post]
19 Sep 2019, 4:08 pm
Borello & Sons, Inc. v. [read post]
19 Sep 2019, 1:11 pm
The bail bondsman’s fee is paid, either through upfront payment or through an installment payment plan. [read post]
19 Sep 2019, 11:30 am
And the Supreme Court is likely to further gut abortion rights, even if it doesn’t immediately overturn Roe v. [read post]
19 Sep 2019, 10:01 am
The constitutional importance of this point is clear: in R (on the application of Bancoult) v Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs, which was cited by Lord Pannick on behalf of Gina Miller during his oral submissions, Lord Hoffmann held that ‘the unique authority Parliament derives from its representative character’. [read post]
19 Sep 2019, 5:49 am
Several of his rulings eventually reached the Supreme Court on appeal, such as the Pentagon Papers case, United States v. [read post]
18 Sep 2019, 4:12 pm
Employers should similarly plan ahead when intending to engage in hard bargaining, as the employer’s actions in doing so may be reviewed by the Board. [read post]
18 Sep 2019, 2:08 pm
February 2, 2011: CMS published a Final Rule entitled “Medicare, Medicaid, and Children’s Health Insurance Programs; Additional Screening Requirements, Application Fees, Temporary Enrollment Moratoria, Payment Suspensions and Compliance Plans for Providers and Suppliers. [read post]
18 Sep 2019, 2:08 pm
February 2, 2011: CMS published a Final Rule entitled “Medicare, Medicaid, and Children’s Health Insurance Programs; Additional Screening Requirements, Application Fees, Temporary Enrollment Moratoria, Payment Suspensions and Compliance Plans for Providers and Suppliers. [read post]
18 Sep 2019, 6:38 am
At issue in this case is whether the Supreme Court of Ohio should update and clarify its attorney fee jurisprudence by adopting the United States Supreme Court’s guidance in Perdue v. [read post]
18 Sep 2019, 1:18 am
1538: Aidan O’Neill QC submits that the role of this court is to rebalance the constitution. 1530: Aidan O’Neill QC refers to the decision in Padfield v Minister of Agriculture at page 1061 of the decision. [read post]
17 Sep 2019, 1:21 pm
This directive also permitted the Assistant Attorney General for the Civil Division to redelegate the authority to issue Civil Investigative Demands to other DOJ Officials, including United States Attorneys.[5] From a practical standpoint, the redelegation of authority to issue Civil Investigative Demands from the Office of the Attorney General to the 94 United States Attorneys Offices has greatly expanded the issuance of Civil Investigative Demands around the country. [read post]
17 Sep 2019, 12:04 pm
Carranza v. [read post]
17 Sep 2019, 9:42 am
AB 5 codifies the “ABC” test for employee status adopted by the California Supreme Court’s 2018 decision in Dynamex v. [read post]
17 Sep 2019, 9:37 am
If Maguire does not comply, Schiff has indicated the committee plans to require him to appear before the committee in an open hearing on Thursday. [read post]
