Search for: "Strong v. State" Results 7461 - 7480 of 14,266
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Jan 2016, 9:00 pm by Carey Sias
Crevor, 3 Binney 121 (1810); Commonwealth v. [read post]
9 Aug 2013, 7:00 am by Spencer L. Reames
 This rule has its genesis in the Court of Appeals decision of Riggs v Palmer, in which the Court stated “[n]o one shall be permitted to profit by his own fraud, or to take advantage of his own wrong, or to found any claim upon his own iniquity, or to acquire property by his own crime” (Riggs v Palmer, 115 NY 506, 511 [1889]). [read post]
5 May 2021, 2:09 pm by Kurt Opsahl
[FN1]   With the strong parallels with Tornillo, you might wonder why the Florida Legislature would pass a law doomed to failure, costing the state the time and expense of defending it in court. [read post]
17 Apr 2013, 6:53 am by Graham Smith
  In that sense the Supreme Court judgment has similarities to the Canadian Supreme Court Copyright Pentalogy and the CJEU decision in Usedsoft v Oracle.The approach articulated by Lord Sumption is the opposite of that stated by Proudman J at first instance: "The exception cannot have been intended to legitimise all copies made in the course of browsing or users would be permitted to watch pirated films and listen to pirated music." [read post]
23 Aug 2012, 4:45 pm by Eugene Volokh
(Eugene Volokh) I read a very interesting opinion today — Cathey v. [read post]
10 Jan 2019, 8:00 am by Eric Caligiuri
On December 28, 2018, the Court in The California Institute of Technology v. [read post]
19 Sep 2017, 4:00 am by Lyonette Louis-Jacques
And only once did I imagine the parties in a case and give them faces – State v. [read post]
9 Aug 2022, 9:48 am by Sandy Levinson
  Part of American Stetll sets out the collapse of an older liberal consensus on the meaning of "separation of church and state," encapsulated in the rhetoric (if not necessarily the result) in Everson v. [read post]
13 Sep 2011, 5:13 am
” Levy also contended that the award violates the strong policy of the State of New York and “denies petitioner his Constitutional right to due process of law.... [read post]