Search for: "The United States, Petitioner"
Results 7461 - 7480
of 8,963
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Jul 2009, 8:11 am
One page opinion - death penalty was unconstitutional After reading briefs from the Furman team as well as the State of Georgia and various interested parties in their "friend of the court" briefs (amicus curaie), a majority vote of 5 to 4 held that the death penalty violated the United States Constitution. [read post]
14 Oct 2007, 5:22 am
Because a finding of frivolousness prevents an alien from obtaining any other relief under the Immigration and Nationality Act ("INA") for which he might otherwise qualify (except for withholding of removal, which Lazar does not seek), the IJ denied Lazar's application for an adjustment of status based on his marriage to a naturalized United States citizen. [read post]
7 Oct 2014, 4:35 pm
His dissent ten years later in United States v. [read post]
23 Jul 2019, 2:55 pm
This chapter shall be liberally construed to effectuate its purposes; provided that this chapter shall not be construed as conferring any power or permitting any action which is inconsistent with the Constitution and laws of the United States, but, in so construing this chapter, due consideration shall be given to the circumstances as they exist from time to time. [read post]
23 Jul 2019, 2:55 pm
This chapter shall be liberally construed to effectuate its purposes; provided that this chapter shall not be construed as conferring any power or permitting any action which is inconsistent with the Constitution and laws of the United States, but, in so construing this chapter, due consideration shall be given to the circumstances as they exist from time to time. [read post]
1 May 2012, 12:58 pm
BRUGMANN, Petitioner, v. [read post]
14 Dec 2021, 5:00 am
Shortly before the first official case of COVID-19 appeared in the United States, our court decided a case involving a religious objection to another vaccine mandate. [read post]
17 Jan 2019, 11:28 am
Solicitor General Noel Francisco argued the case on behalf of the United States. [read post]
17 Apr 2019, 7:01 pm
Prior decisions of the United States Court of Appeals for the 5th Circuit and scattered language in Supreme Court opinions and in the statute’s legislative history have suggested that—this seemingly broad language notwithstanding—state law only becomes relevant when federal law creates a substantive or remedial gap that needs to be filled. [read post]
1 May 2015, 9:19 am
Petitioners contend that the ordinance violates the Second Amendment as interpreted in District of Columbia v. [read post]
29 Apr 2010, 11:17 am
United States v. [read post]
10 Jan 2023, 1:56 pm
” Read generously, this clause seems to incorporate, for example, prior decisions of the FLRA (going back to the early 1970s) upholding bargaining between unions and state National Guards over certified bargaining units. [read post]
10 Nov 2016, 8:58 am
In a pointed reminder that a perfectly CEQA-compliant EIR for a large infill project is difficult to prepare, however, the Court found merit in a single argument of the petitioner and appellant neighborhood group, ESPLC – its argument that “the EIR ignored [certain] significant traffic impacts. [read post]
17 Jun 2023, 3:45 am
New YorkDecision Date: June 25, 2018 The United States District Court for the Southern District of New York granted a motion to dismiss the claims filed by the petitioner, Kelly Price, who was blocked from two official public Twitter accounts after complaining about the treatment she received from public officials in her own cases of domestic violence. [read post]
30 May 2019, 8:11 am
United States, 18-7739. [read post]
Mayo Foundation v. U.S.: Supreme Court Brushes Off Medical Residents, Unsettles Agency Deference Law
13 Jan 2011, 3:30 am
United States, 440 U.S. 472 (1979). [read post]
24 Apr 2018, 1:47 pm
” Thomas acknowledges a set of 19th-century cases in which the Supreme Court explained not only that “[t]he only authority competent to set a patent aside, or to annul it … is vested in the courts of the United States, and not in the department which issued the patent,” but also that administrative invalidation would “deprive the applicant of his property without due process of law, and would be in fact an invasion of the judicial branch. [read post]
10 Jun 2024, 12:00 pm
The constitution prevents the state from harming the public interest. [read post]
22 Jan 2013, 10:56 am
The structure of the bill “To ensure the complete and timely payment of the obligations of the United States Government until May 19, 2013, and for other purposes” is simple: Two sections. [read post]
25 Apr 2019, 7:04 pm
” Indeed, earlier this term in United States v. [read post]
