Search for: "United States v. Close" Results 7461 - 7480 of 14,200
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 Dec 2014, 6:37 am by Daniel Schwartz
UPS, I predict the court will punt on the issue of the extent of the Pregnancy Discrimination Act, deferring to the United States’ brief recommending the same thing. [read post]
28 Dec 2014, 4:12 pm by Giles Peaker
These were questions in Lawal & Anor v Circle 33 Housing Trust [2014] EWCA Civ 1514. [read post]
27 Dec 2014, 2:19 am by Ben
 Viacom and YouTube settled Viacom's 2007 litigation with a joint statement saying  "This settlement reflects the growing collaborative dialogue between our two companies on important opportunities, and we look forward to working more closely together". [read post]
26 Dec 2014, 12:21 pm
You need to let your guards down and let me be close to you. [read post]
26 Dec 2014, 7:47 am by Robert Kreisman
The panel noted that the district court had stated that it found its decision on summary judgment in the case to be a close call and that it did not find bad faith on the part of nClosures in filing the lawsuit. [read post]
24 Dec 2014, 5:00 am
  In this case the United States Supreme Court held that a state attorney general action (really brought by contingent fee counsel proceeding in an AG’s name), ostensibly on behalf of all the citizens of a state, did not qualify as a “mass action” under the Class Action Fairness Act (“CAFA”) so as to allow removal to federal court. [read post]
23 Dec 2014, 10:43 am by Stephen Wermiel
More recently, under Chief Justice John Roberts, the Court in the name of freedom of speech has expanded the ability of corporations and unions to spend funds directly in elections in Citizens United v. [read post]
20 Dec 2014, 7:27 pm
  That has already been made clear in the United States, where members of the Republican Party vowed to take countermeasures. [read post]
18 Dec 2014, 10:48 pm by Florian Mueller
Two weeks ago, the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit held a hearing on the damages award and underlying liability issues in the first Apple v. [read post]
18 Dec 2014, 5:51 am by SHG
But as the Appellate Division recognized, the United States Supreme Court has consistently held that an arresting officer’s subjective intent, however determined, offers no basis for negating an objectively valid arrest. [read post]
17 Dec 2014, 3:18 pm by Kent Scheidegger
  The Court left open the singular case of murders by life-sentenced inmates (which it closed 11 years later), but otherwise mitigation had to be considered.In 1978, the Supreme Court decided in Lockett v. [read post]
17 Dec 2014, 4:30 am
That doctrine comes into play when: (1) the federal plaintiff lost in state court; (2) the plaintiff complains of some injury from the state court judgment; (3) the state court judgment antedated the filing of the federal case; and (4) the plaintiff is inviting the federal court to reject the state court judgment.   The plaintiffs appealed that decision to the Third Circuit, and that’s where we are today: Johnson v. [read post]
16 Dec 2014, 2:01 pm by Kent Scheidegger
Here's an interesting development in the case of United States v. [read post]