Search for: "mark"
Results 7461 - 7480
of 136,001
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 May 2014, 11:18 am
Patently-O commentator Mark Bartholomew points to this Federal Circuit case. [read post]
14 Feb 2025, 12:55 am
’s registration of the TONOSAMA mark on the ground of likelihood of confusion with Narita Export LLC’s mark TONOSAMA for candy, based on Narita’s predecessor’s priority of use. [read post]
18 Jul 2023, 10:14 am
Mark Fenster is the Marshall M. [read post]
10 Jan 2010, 3:58 pm
Yes, this might seem very basic – but many times, business owners register what they think their mark is instead of registering the mark that the business is using.2. [read post]
31 May 2022, 2:10 pm
Specifically, the USPTO clarified that, “for an examining attorney to establish a prima facie case that an applied-for mark is generic, for the purpose of refusing to register the mark on the Principal or Supplemental Register, there must be sufficient evidence to support a ‘reasonable predicate’ (i.e., reasonable basis) for finding the mark generic under the applicable legal standard. [read post]
26 Apr 2023, 3:14 am
It was because of her close friendship with Mark Sewell and because she was seeking to provide emotional support to him, and not because Mark Sewell had control over her as an elder, that Mrs B went to the back room. [read post]
14 Oct 2018, 7:36 pm
Regarding similarities between the marks, the marks share the common term, Constellation. [read post]
2 Jun 2011, 2:06 am
"Family of Marks: In its brief, Petitioner for the first time claimed a family of marks. [read post]
14 Dec 2018, 2:41 pm
Real Foods argued that the marks were suggestive. [read post]
22 Mar 2011, 2:57 am
However, the Board noted that the mark has always been used as a "secondary mark" in connection with Opposer's "MoneyGuard" service mark. [read post]
26 Jan 2013, 4:08 pm
In his Report Lord Justice Leveson considered and rejected a proposal that there should be a statutory right of reply or correction. [read post]
29 Oct 2008, 10:57 am
What they said, in a judgment delivered by Toulson LJ, was this: * In the case of an alleged infringement under section 10(2) of the Trade Marks 1994 Act (similar marks/goods, similar marks/same goods or same marks/similar goods) giving rise to criminal liability under section 92, a likelihood of confusion had to be proved -- but no likelihood of confusion need be proved for liability under section 10(1) (same marks/same goods). * This was a section 10(1)… [read post]
21 Mar 2023, 2:56 pm
Thus, when the NNENNA LOVETTE mark matured into a registration, it could be asserted to refuse registration of another mark (in this case, the LOVETTE mark) even though Applicant had filed for the LOVETTE mark before Opposer had filed for the NNENNA LOVETTE mark. [read post]
18 Feb 2010, 3:43 am
The information given by the mark is indirect and vague. [read post]
21 Mar 2023, 2:56 pm
Thus, when the NNENNA LOVETTE mark matured into a registration, it could be asserted to refuse registration of another mark (in this case, the LOVETTE mark) even though Applicant had filed for the LOVETTE mark before Opposer had filed for the NNENNA LOVETTE mark. [read post]
8 May 2025, 6:40 am
In fact, the court noted, the mark and name are identical. [read post]
23 Jun 2023, 4:07 am
" Moreover, the cited standard character mark could be displayed in the same font as applicant's mark. [read post]
20 Sep 2018, 1:49 pm
Cai’s mark based on a likelihood of confusion with its registered TAI CHI mark. [read post]
21 Nov 2023, 10:20 am
The Mark eventually registered in 2003 (the Registration). [read post]
16 Mar 2021, 9:33 pm
, was infringing those trade marks through the use of the mark ATLANTIC. [read post]
