Search for: "A & R Productions"
Results 7481 - 7500
of 99,329
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 May 2020, 9:03 pm
In 2019, the National Advisory Committee on Microbiological Criteria for Foods recommended FSIS consider serotype-specific pre-harvest controls and the development of approaches that exclude Salmonella serotypes of public health concern from raw poultry products. [read post]
21 May 2020, 9:01 pm
The fish product category was second followed by meat products other than poultry. [read post]
21 May 2020, 7:26 pm
Thereafter, the ARRC plans to review these responses and release a final recommendation with respect to the spread adjustment methodology for cash products. [read post]
21 May 2020, 4:29 pm
A New York company has stopped production and recalled curry powder after tests showed the finished product was contaminated with Salmonella. [read post]
21 May 2020, 4:15 pm
This Ford Factory is currently providing services under a Defense Production Act contract. [read post]
21 May 2020, 1:17 pm
CHAPTER II - CONSUMER PRODUCT SAFETY COMMISSION. [read post]
21 May 2020, 1:03 pm
While the health and safety of workers remains a top priority of companies involved in the production of minerals, many are now assessing the economic impact of the pandemic on their business, operations, and capital. [read post]
21 May 2020, 9:57 am
Instead of just making and selling the final products, they obtained patents and licensed their innovations to manufacturers. [read post]
21 May 2020, 6:47 am
In order to rely on this exception, organisations will need to: (i) assess any likely adverse effect to the individuals and implement measures to eliminate, reduce or mitigate such identified adverse effect, (ii) make a determination that the benefit to the public (or any section thereof) outweighs any likely residual adverse effect to the individual; and (iii) disclose their reliance on legitimate interests to the individual to collect, use or disclose personal data; and business improvement… [read post]
21 May 2020, 5:56 am
According to these principles, a geographical name is not eligible for registration as a trademark if it is known to the relevant public and can be perceived as an indication of (geographical) origin because the relevant public establishes a link between the place or region and the designated product and reasonably believes that the product is closely connected with it, e.g. is an indication of the possible place of manufacture of the designated goods. [read post]
21 May 2020, 4:00 am
R., Inc., 144 DPR 830 (1998), no fue incluida en el código, limitando los derechos de los consumidores. [read post]
20 May 2020, 9:04 pm
The charges are related to the 2015 multi-state outbreak of Listeria associated with Blue Bell’s ice cream production. [read post]
20 May 2020, 9:03 pm
Extending mandatory origin or provenance indications to certain products is being looked at. [read post]
20 May 2020, 3:03 pm
Patent trolls demand money that struggling companies don’t have; and thriving companies will have less to spend on R&D and innovation. [read post]
20 May 2020, 2:44 pm
Productive 2019 at this firm! [read post]
20 May 2020, 2:15 pm
We are not looking to engage in a partisan witch hunt, we are asking for your help to engage in a productive effort that will save lives. [read post]
20 May 2020, 1:06 pm
” After FINRA staff sent a request to Kinsman for the production of information, he purportedly refused to cooperate with the investigation and consequently has been barred for associating with any FINRA member at any time. [read post]
20 May 2020, 11:08 am
… [read post]
20 May 2020, 8:54 am
The court held that while it is mindful of certain ethical obligations that may be implicated by Reichel's request (ABA Standards of Criminal Justice, Defense Function Standards and Commentary and Minnesota Rules of Professional Conduct), ethical obligations do not vest the court with authority to compel the production from a former attorney of the case files. [read post]
19 May 2020, 11:42 pm
This is noteworthy, especially since there was a prior BoA decision where the claim that the Chinese characters featured in both marks were identical was not upheld (R 2395/2016-4). [read post]
