Search for: "ACCESS TO JUSTICE COMMISSION" Results 7481 - 7500 of 8,038
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Feb 2009, 7:35 pm
Currently, it is the policy of the Department of Justice to prosecute only covered entities for such disclosure. [read post]
24 Feb 2009, 8:30 am
I’d go further and say that law commission reports, particularly those relating to large projects, must also attempt to relate the law to other disciplines and to experiential knowledge to portray a much larger understanding of how the interrelationship among them can increase access to justice. [read post]
23 Feb 2009, 8:22 am
Supreme Court Justices, several of whom place little value on truth or honesty (e.g., Rehnquist (previously), Roberts, Alito, Scalia), keep both liability, and the associated concept of duty, narrow in the securities field lest, they say by way of excuse, a defendant be liable to many people. [read post]
23 Feb 2009, 7:08 am
  The case (Federal Communications Commission v. [read post]
20 Feb 2009, 8:08 am
Keller's conduct constitutes willful or persistent conduct that casts public discredit on the judiciary or the administration of justice. [read post]
20 Feb 2009, 7:59 am
A judge may ask the Chief Justice of the [Texas] Supreme Court for appointment of a special court of review. [read post]
20 Feb 2009, 7:41 am
The commission said Keller's action "casts public discredit on the judiciary" and the administration of justice. [read post]
19 Feb 2009, 2:30 am by Darius
As Mr Justice McMahon pointed out, "the error in this case was prompted by the wording of the form used by the Commission". ....As regards the wording of the Mental Health Act, a number of issues have arisen regarding the time limits, and these have led to the Commission issuing a 1,200-word guidance page on "Duration of Involuntary Admission and Renewal Orders". [read post]
18 Feb 2009, 9:24 am
  The press conference, brought to you by the Texas Access to Justice Foundation & Texas Access to Justice Commission can be viewed online by [...] [read post]
18 Feb 2009, 1:03 am
Documents listed are accessible   through subscription to the GalleryWatch.com service. [read post]
16 Feb 2009, 4:00 am
In a decision dated May 9, 2007, written by New York County Supreme Court Justice Jane S. [read post]
13 Feb 2009, 8:00 am
(IPKat)   United States US General Sen Gregg withdraws from nomination to be next Secretary of Commerce (Inventive Step) (Patently-O) Influx of Big Content lawyers at Department of Justice: cause for concern? [read post]
13 Feb 2009, 6:00 am
Not one member of the Senate voted against him, though three did abstain, as a protest over the fact that the list of nominations by the State Commission on Judicial Nomination, from which Governor Patterson is required to choose, included no women and few minorities.The New York Times quoted Senator Ruben Diaz, Sr. as saying, "My frustration, my concern is the system. [read post]
13 Feb 2009, 5:00 am
(Profitability through Simplicity) Patent World SPC round-up ‘Prolonging Patent Protection’ by Marjan Noor (SPC Blog) EU: Commission’s view on paediatric extensions (The SPC Blog) EU: Suing, not suing both attract the Commission’s attention – EU pharma inquiry (PatLit) EU: Life Science marks held confusingly similar: Bayern Innovativ – Bayerische Gesellschaft für Innovation und Wissenstransfer mbH, v Office for… [read post]
12 Feb 2009, 1:29 am
All this information can be accessed on-line on the ISBA Web site. [read post]
11 Feb 2009, 7:44 am
Last session the Legislature increased state funding to help ensure access to court appointed counsel for low-income Texans. [read post]
6 Feb 2009, 8:19 am
To access previous editions of Petitions to Watch, visit our archives on SCOTUSwiki. [read post]
5 Feb 2009, 3:36 pm
The Court of Appeals majority said, Whatever else it prohibits, the First Amendment does not forbid a school board from removing a book because it contains factual inaccuracies, whether they be of commission or omission. [read post]
4 Feb 2009, 2:14 pm
Of course, it is imperative for the judicial system to explore ways in which the procedural fairness of the accused can be respected while respecting religious rights and striving to remove cultural/religious barriers to access to justice. [read post]