Search for: "All Defendants"
Results 7481 - 7500
of 165,028
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Jul 2013, 10:06 pm
A painful night, all around. [read post]
27 Jan 2014, 8:42 am
We reverse the judgment of the trial court with respect to its order to file a joint tax return and affirm the judgment in all other respects.") [read post]
6 Feb 2010, 6:20 am
On the contrary, because defense attorneys that know how to defend these cases are able to obtain all of the necessary discovery, there is a good chance that some error can be found that will enable a top notch defense lawyer to successfully defend you. [read post]
5 Mar 2015, 10:11 am
The defendants set the rates for all of the services expected of the plaintiffs. [read post]
16 Jan 2015, 9:39 am
Ct. 746 (2014) precluded the court's the exercise of general jurisdiction over this, "and likely all," ANDA suits. [read post]
12 Aug 2013, 2:39 pm
All of these measures were instituted to "enable the defendant in all cases to have the same opportunity to be heard as the complainant." [read post]
1 Feb 2017, 5:43 am
And that is all we need to know. [read post]
21 May 2008, 2:15 pm
See also KSTP: 15 percent of state's public defenders may be laid offand the Star-Tribune: Public defenders are put on list of proposed budget cuts - Financial woes and a tough economy could mean layoffs for more than 60; all 87 counties would be affectedAnd light a candle for our friend Accident Prone. [read post]
15 Aug 2010, 8:28 am
(The expression "of all time" highlights the silliness of the list. [read post]
23 May 2014, 3:08 pm
The defendant, the City of New York has motioned for a summary judgment in all of the cases. [read post]
20 May 2013, 7:57 am
Because the federal perpetuation of the racially discriminatory mandatory minimum crack sentences for those defendants sentenced under the old law violates the Equal Protection Clause, the Act should apply to all defendants, including those sentenced prior to its passage. [read post]
12 Aug 2014, 8:12 am
I mean, obviously we all listen, and we all pay attention when the judge is addressing our clients, but if important parts of the colloquy are missed, it can lead to a post-conviction relief (PCR) case.The court must ask the defendant if he or she agrees with the underlying factual basis to support the charges. [read post]
12 Jun 2017, 6:27 am
So the most amazing part isn't the disparate treatment between the two defendants, but that these false convictions were ever brought to the light of day at all. [read post]
4 Mar 2015, 4:13 pm
Years later, the couple learned from the Iranian government that they could return to Iran and reclaim all of their property.To facilitate the reclamation, the couple executed powers of attorney in favor of the defendants, Iranian nationals. [read post]
31 Jan 2013, 12:17 pm
As such, the Court overturns the Defendant's convictions for aggravated murder with a firearms specification and he shall be discharged from prison forthwith.. . .The Court finds that no reasonable juror, when carefully considering all available evidence in the underlying trial in light of the new Y-STR DNA exclusion evidence, would be firmly convinced that that Defendant Douglas Prade was guilty of aggravated murder with a firearm. [read post]
22 May 2014, 2:08 pm
The other two Doe daughters have, at the urging of Defendants Mastoloni, Kessler, Esposito, and Sullivan, cut off all of their communications with the rest of the Doe family, including extended family. [read post]
13 May 2011, 5:40 pm
Moreover, the record shows that plaintiff could not prove all of the necessary elements of that theory (see Cuffy v City of New York, 69 NY2d 255 [1987]). [read post]
27 Jul 2012, 4:14 am
As a result, all parties will usually present their position at one trial and the same jury will determine both matters. [read post]
21 Jul 2011, 10:23 am
Under the Court's Discovery Order, requests for production are not required; parties are expected to produce all relevant documents without formal requests for production. [read post]
20 May 2008, 11:43 am
In a blistering decision, the district court found that the government had "struck hard" at the defendants by misleading them: "Prior to the issuance of the Pimentel Letters, the Government almost certainly knew all of the relevant facts, yet the letters (allegedly based on the Government's knowledge) did not square with the Government's determination of relevant conduct. [read post]
