Search for: "Application of Smith"
Results 7481 - 7500
of 7,623
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Apr 2007, 8:20 am
The contributors are experts in this specialized area and provide thorough, yet accessible, overviews of biotech subspecialties with an eye to practical application. [read post]
25 Apr 2007, 11:31 pm
Supreme Court overturned 3 death sentences.In Smith, Brewer, and Abdul-Kabir, the Court revisited a state system that has dogged it since Jurek, the 1976 decision to which the website alluded. [read post]
25 Apr 2007, 11:26 pm
Smith DID cite a 1999 article by LBE:Lawrence B. [read post]
25 Apr 2007, 1:11 pm
As in Smith v. [read post]
25 Apr 2007, 9:32 am
Kennedy wrote the majority opinion in Smith v. [read post]
25 Apr 2007, 9:17 am
" Smith v. [read post]
24 Apr 2007, 8:02 pm
Mark Smith at Techlawforum wrote of KSR v. [read post]
23 Apr 2007, 2:00 am
A3659 Kirwan (MS) -- Closes loophole by requiring additional consecutive sentence of five years where a determinate sentence is imposed for criminal use of a firearm in the first degree
No Same as
BLURB : Pen L. addtl min, crim use weapon
First Act: 01/26/07 referred to codes
Last Act: 04/16/07 motion to discharge lost
A4958 Aubry -- Allows the second chance commission upon application to order upon termination of criminal… [read post]
22 Apr 2007, 7:15 am
`(B) For purposes of subparagraph (A), the term `joint research agreement’ means a written contract, grant, or cooperative agreement entered into by two or more persons or entities for the performance of experimental, developmental, or research work in the field of the claimed invention. `(4) PATENTS AND PUBLISHED APPLICATIONS EFFECTIVELY FILED- A patent or application for patent is effectively filed under subsection (a)(2) with respect to any subject matter described in… [read post]
18 Apr 2007, 7:38 pm
Congressional Players: The Senate version was introduced by Senators Leahy, Hatch, Schumar, and Cornyn The House version was introduced by Representatives Berman, Smith, Conyers, Coble, Boucher, Godlatte, Zoe Lofgren, Issa, Schiff, Cannon, and Jackson-Lee Lobbying Players: www.innovationalliance.net (Tech Companies who want strong patents) www.ipo.org (Industry group -- Formerly supported strong IP rights -- now a consensus builder -- noting that "the battle-of-the-industries… [read post]
18 Apr 2007, 7:22 am
The reform measures include the following provisions: First-to-file rights and elimination of interference proceedings; Reform to make it easier to file a patent application without the inventor's cooperation; Limitation of damages to only the economic value of the improvement as compared to the prior-art; Specific limitations on when damages may be trebled for willfulness; Post-grant opposition proceedings with a reduction in the litigation estoppel effect; … [read post]
17 Apr 2007, 8:27 pm
After all, I've only blogged on the subject of federal preemption generally, and specifically on this case, maybe more times than the late Anna Nicole Smith created potential fathers of her future offspring. [read post]
17 Apr 2007, 6:47 pm
Smith, 2007 U.S. [read post]
17 Apr 2007, 5:01 am
United States, 389 U.S. 347, 359 (1967); Smith v. [read post]
16 Apr 2007, 10:28 am
S 4410
BLURB : Ad Cd. credit prior service; PPF
Last Act: 04/13/07 referred to governmental employees
A7398 Abbate (MS) -- Provides certain benefits to police officers employed by bi-state commissions or authorities for injuries or illness incurred in the performance of duty
No Same as
BLURB : Gen Mun. police officers; benefit
Last Act: 04/13/07 referred to local governments
A7411 Benjamin (MS) -- Provides for… [read post]
16 Apr 2007, 7:59 am
They brought us up to speed on their latest efforts to provide application service management systems for the legal arena. [read post]
16 Apr 2007, 7:58 am
It blew away the Treasury's defence against a Times FoI application on pensions. [read post]
16 Apr 2007, 7:23 am
OpinionPub DateShort Title/District 07a0130p.06 2007/04/09 Smith v. [read post]
16 Apr 2007, 2:20 am
Considering the record presented in the record and the applicable standards of review, the Court concluded Seller had not met their burden.Affirmed.J. [read post]
15 Apr 2007, 9:43 am
Ct. 455 (1935) for the proposition "*1075 Under the statute it is the claims of the patent which define the invention" and cited Smith v. [read post]
