Search for: "CO.1. Means"
Results 7481 - 7500
of 16,765
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Aug 2011, 10:07 am
§ 106(1). [read post]
17 Feb 2017, 8:39 am
– 1:45 p.m. [read post]
28 Mar 2014, 5:33 pm
At issue are (1) whether "the district court [correctly] construed the term '4-amino-3-(2-methylpropyl) butanoic acid' to mean 'the chemical compound 4-amino-3-(2-methylpropyl) butanoic acid,' without limitationas to stereochemical form," Pfizer at *6; and (2) whether "claim 2 is not invalid for lack of [a] enablement, [b] insufficient written description, or [c] obviousness," Id. at *7.Holdings(1) "We perceive no error in the district court's construction. . . . [read post]
23 Jun 2022, 1:59 am
Those who think that securing a registration without encountering an opposition means you’re safe should think again! [read post]
27 Jan 2022, 8:57 am
An April 2021 report co-authored by Human Rights Watch and Stanford Law School details “crimes against humanity,” including mass detention, forced labor, torture, and cultural and religious erasure. [read post]
7 Aug 2015, 8:36 am
We need to have a conversation about what ownership means, rather than having a subtle and slow redefinition of what ownership means. [read post]
25 Oct 2017, 4:27 pm
Per the regulation, “ ‘[r]apidly report’ means within 72 hours of discovery of any cyber incident. [read post]
26 Oct 2017, 11:30 am
Per the regulation, “ ‘[r]apidly report’ means within 72 hours of discovery of any cyber incident. [read post]
8 Sep 2009, 11:37 am
Real Estate (3d ed. 2001) §§ 1:60, 1:100; 2 Witkin, Cal. [read post]
25 Feb 2008, 7:15 am
Scotts Co., LLC, No. 07-10104-GAO, 2008 WL 251971, slip op. at 1 (D. [read post]
29 Jun 2021, 11:41 am
” The Court’s use of the word “significant” can only be interpreted to mean that future as-applied challenge may require a showing by the injured worker that their injury is “more significant” than other “significant” Class I impairments. [read post]
9 Oct 2014, 8:46 am
[Disclosure: Goldstein & Russell, P.C., whose attorneys contribute to this blog in various capacities, serves as co-counsel to the respondent in this case.] [read post]
18 Jan 2024, 11:11 pm
[This post is co-authored with Professor Seth Barrett Tillman] Trump v. [read post]
17 Dec 2009, 4:51 am
Co. v. [read post]
16 Nov 2017, 1:36 pm
Clients should provide my office with the following 1. [read post]
30 Nov 2023, 7:57 am
Co., — N.Y.S.3d —-, 2023 N.Y. [read post]
11 Sep 2013, 4:00 am
Further investigation determined that the handgun was a Crosman Pro77 airgun that fires .177 calibre spherical BBs propelled by means of compressed air from a canister. [read post]
29 Nov 2018, 9:37 am
Supreme Court, in Christiansburg Garment Co. v. [read post]
5 Jul 2019, 2:30 pm
However, if co-workers attest to seeing it, that helps to substantially bolster the case. [read post]
18 Jan 2017, 4:10 am
Indeed, it is titled “Proposed Senate Bill No. 1″ and is co-sponsored by several senators. [read post]
