Search for: "Court, U.S. Supreme Court" Results 7481 - 7500 of 99,600
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Feb 2023, 5:16 am by Roger Parloff
The parties seem to agree that the key precedent at this stage is the 1961 Supreme Court ruling in Irvin v. [read post]
8 Feb 2023, 4:18 am by Emma Snell
  The Biden administration has urged the Supreme Court to dismiss a challenge to ending the pandemic-era immigration measure, Title 42, saying that the government’s announcement that the health emergency would expire on May 11 would make the case moot. [read post]
8 Feb 2023, 4:15 am by Alec Pronk
Supreme Court asking the Court to clarify issues related to the application of the Lanham Act to trademark disputes that cross international borders. [read post]
8 Feb 2023, 4:15 am by Alec Pronk
Supreme Court asking the Court to clarify issues related to the application of the Lanham Act to trademark disputes that cross international borders. [read post]
8 Feb 2023, 4:10 am by Howard Friedman
Supreme Court last week in Faith Bible Chapel International v. [read post]
7 Feb 2023, 5:15 pm by Jason Mazzone
(If the North Carolina Supreme Court were to wholeheartedly embrace ISL and overturn its past decision on the ground that Article I of the U.S. [read post]
7 Feb 2023, 3:51 pm by Jonathan H. Adler
Details need to be worked out, but the first step is to recognize that the Supreme Court will not and cannot solve this problem. [read post]
7 Feb 2023, 6:48 am by Russell Cawyer
Supreme Court is considering what the lengths to which an employer must go to accommodate an employee’s sincerely held religious beliefs. [read post]
7 Feb 2023, 6:40 am by SCOTUSblog
Here’s the Tuesday morning read: Dobbs Was Always Just the Beginning (Dahlia Lithwick & Mark Joseph Stern, Slate) Federal court upholds NY rent stabilization laws, setting up possible Supreme Court showdown (David Brand, Gothamist) Doctor’s opioid prescription conviction tossed after U.S. [read post]
As the Supreme Court declined to review, the definitive answer to both questions will not be established until a later date. [read post]
7 Feb 2023, 5:31 am by Mykhailo Soldatenko
However, according to Pifer, who later served as U.S. ambassador to Ukraine, while the parties allegedly did not discuss details of the U.S. response under this commitment, in his opinion, the response should involve military assistance. [read post]
7 Feb 2023, 5:31 am by Norman L. Eisen
Nevertheless, that judicial decision is currently being reviewed by the Court of Appeals. [read post]
7 Feb 2023, 4:56 am by jonathanturley
” It is also true that the Supreme Court also did not rule out a theory based on the Preamble. [read post]
7 Feb 2023, 3:00 am by jonathanturley
Courts have become untethered from the narrow parameters laid down by the Supreme Court in prior cases. [read post]