Search for: "DOE DEFENDANT" Results 7481 - 7500 of 112,789
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 May 2016, 6:00 am by Brian Hall
Because the DTSA does not pre-empt state laws protecting trade secrets, however, if a federal forum is otherwise appealing, there really is no reason not to pursue a DTSA cause of action. [read post]
19 Jul 2017, 8:52 am by WOLFGANG DEMINO
 A MOTION FOR ENTRY OF DEFAULT JUDGMENT is filed when the Defendant does not answer by the time his or her written answer is due, as stated on the CITATION. [read post]
26 Jul 2011, 7:00 am
The plaintiff, Karen McPeters, challenged the electronic filing charges imposed by the defendant, LexisNexis, on litigants in Texas state courts in Montgomery and Jefferson Counties. [read post]
28 Mar 2018, 4:56 am by SHG
Does she not grasp that every litigant is entitled to appeal? [read post]
11 Jun 2012, 7:11 am by Jessica Monaco, ACLU
Doe held that the Constitution guarantees all children, regardless of immigration status, equal access to a basic public education. [read post]
22 Jan 2015, 4:31 am by Gritsforbreakfast
It is not public information that the sheriff in Arizona, for one thing, does not have a state agency that oversees rules on running a county jail. [read post]
9 Dec 2011, 12:44 pm
In order to convict a person of burglary, the state must prove the defendant does not own or have rightful possession of the property. [read post]
9 Jun 2008, 1:08 pm
Exclusionary rule serves no purpose where the defendant assaults an officer during an illegal search. [read post]
13 Jul 2013, 7:41 am by Steven Eversole
But Alabama does have a "stand your ground" self-defense law, similar to the one in Florida we've been hearing so much about in the wake of the George Zimmerman/Trayvon Martin case. [read post]
25 Aug 2014, 5:37 am
  On appeal, the defendant claims that there was insufficient evidence to convict him of (1) attempt to interfere with an officer because (A) § 53a-167a does not apply to physical or verbal conduct directed against a third party and (B) applying § 53a-167a to conduct with a possible indirect effect upon a police investigation would render the statute void for vagueness; and (2) intimidating a witness. [read post]
8 Sep 2015, 5:55 am
 We conclude that recording a telephone conversation with the consent of one party to that conversation does not violate article first, § 7, of the state constitution, and that the trial court's failure to inquire into the defendant's competency was not improper. [read post]
26 Jul 2014, 7:25 pm
The prosecutor's conduct on summation was less than admirable but does not warrant reversal. [read post]
12 Jul 2013, 5:00 pm
But Alabama does have a "stand your ground" self-defense law, similar to the one in Florida we've been hearing so much about in the wake of the George Zimmerman/Trayvon Martin case. [read post]
29 Mar 2016, 6:41 pm by Cory Doctorow
But the W3C's EME framework does not enable many of the applications that the law allows. [read post]
18 May 2022, 8:00 am by Robert Kreisman
The defendants disputed Doe’s damages and argued that the heart issues resulted from Doe’s underlying condition, not the negligence of the defendants. [read post]
2 Mar 2020, 10:01 pm by Doug Austin
 »   Related StoriesPlaintiff Tells Defendant “File Motion to Compel”, Defendant Does and Wins: eDiscovery Case LawCourt Rules on Status of “Functional Employee, Declines Sanctions as Premature: eDiscovery Case LawThe Sedona Conference Has an Updated Glossary (Again): eDiscovery Best Practices  [read post]
23 Feb 2015, 6:50 pm
The fact that defendant delivered her deed to J and J ultimately recorded the reciprocal deeds of the parties on December 18, 1978 does not establish that he initially received plaintiff's deed on December 1, 1978 as agent for defendant. [read post]
6 Mar 2015, 6:44 pm
The fact that defendant delivered her deed to J and J ultimately recorded the reciprocal deeds of the parties on December 18, 1978 does not establish that he initially received plaintiff's deed on December 1, 1978 as agent for defendant. [read post]