Search for: "HOPE v. STATE" Results 7481 - 7500 of 16,492
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Jul 2009, 7:24 am
Three recent films - Children of Men, V for Vendetta, and Minority Report - sound a warning call by painting stark and contrasting visions of life in the United States and Great Britain in the 21st century. [read post]
13 Apr 2010, 9:30 am by Greg Guedel
The Tribal Supreme Court Project is hoping the new appointee will help reverse a disturbing trend – Tribal interests losing nearly every case that comes before the Court. [read post]
23 Nov 2009, 12:00 pm
Related posts: Entire Market Value Rule Lives As $357 Million Verdict DiesThe appeal in Lucent Technologies, Inc. v. [read post]
26 Sep 2016, 11:10 am by Law Offices of Rudolph E. Loewenstein
Byrd (People v Byrd, July 29, 2016, D.A.R. 7772), the strict requirements of proof worked to his advantage. [read post]
19 Sep 2015, 4:11 am by familoo
Worth noting because it was actually pretty well and accurately reported – the judgment is pretty awful reading (see Lancashire County Council v ABC & Ors [2015] EWFC B124 (29 January 2015)). [read post]
12 Jul 2018, 10:00 am by Adam Faderewski
“We hope that a young person will hear these stories and be inspired to follow in their footsteps. [read post]
17 Dec 2008, 4:24 pm
Secretary of State for the Home Department (Belmarsh detainees case).I hope this analysis is wrong and that the media reports (or my reading of them) have missed some crucial nuance in the Bill. [read post]
26 Sep 2016, 11:10 am by Law Offices of Rudolph E. Loewenstein
Byrd (People v Byrd, July 29, 2016, D.A.R. 7772), the strict requirements of proof worked to his advantage. [read post]
14 Jun 2012, 4:17 pm
  We hope the losing party can somehow settle this and/or obtain a licence to bring this matter to an end. [read post]
11 Apr 2010, 4:01 pm by brettb
Republicans have no problem with an activist court when it asserts itself into state election law as it did in Bush v. [read post]
However, the law also stipulates that the medication must not have been developed in an “aggressor state,” thereby prohibiting the use of the Russian COVID-19 vaccine, Sputnik V. [read post]
26 Sep 2016, 11:10 am by Law Offices of Rudolph E. Loewenstein
Byrd (People v Byrd, July 29, 2016, D.A.R. 7772), the strict requirements of proof worked to his advantage. [read post]
22 Feb 2019, 2:56 am by Walter Olson
Pastides] “Sokal Squared” hoax runs into IRB (human subjects review) issues at Portland State, and it’s more complicated than you might think [Jesse Singal, New York] “A Liberal Case for DeVos’s Reforms” [Lara Bazelon, New York Times] After initial resistance, ACLU moving to acknowledge merit of some objections to Obama-era Title IX procedure [Conor Friedersdorf, The Atlantic] Attorneys general from 18 states plus D.C. sign letter arguing… [read post]