Search for: "House v. State"
Results 7481 - 7500
of 25,472
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Nov 2007, 6:56 am
State v. [read post]
19 Dec 2021, 10:43 am
India’s Joint Parliamentary Committee Thursday published its report on the 2019 Personal Data Protection (PDP) Bill in both houses of Parliament. [read post]
18 Jul 2007, 6:36 am
Harvie Wilkinson III, Judge Paul V. [read post]
27 Dec 2023, 8:48 am
The object of the bill is stated to be the revision and consolidation of laws pertaining to the development, expansion and operation of telecommunication services and networks. [read post]
3 Jul 2023, 11:11 am
Such a claim would trivialize free speech protection in the way that the Court in Rumsfeld v. [read post]
3 Mar 2014, 7:06 am
The Court denied review of two new cases involving the power of state or local governments to regulate housing and other opportunities for undocumented immigrants. [read post]
21 Aug 2023, 4:00 am
Haywood v. [read post]
25 Apr 2007, 6:49 am
The measure, which Governor John Hoeven [official website] is expected to sign, passed the state House 68-24 and the Senate 29-16. [read post]
12 Jan 2011, 4:27 pm
The Grand Chamber stated in Cumpana v Romania on 17 December 2004 at paragraph 91, in the context of a publication covered by Article 10, that Article 8 “may require the adoption of positive measures designed to secure effective respect for private life even in the sp [read post]
15 Apr 2013, 7:56 am
On 16 April 2013 it will be back before the Commons on “ping pong”, the stage at which the Commons considers new amendments made by the House of Lords. [read post]
8 May 2009, 11:56 am
By Kelly Becker The Louisiana legislature is currently considering House Bill 758 which would allow the Attorney General to pay up to a twenty-five percent contingency fee to outside attorneys to represent the State in litigation. [read post]
15 Oct 2006, 7:39 am
US v. [read post]
17 May 2018, 3:53 am
In Epps v. [read post]
14 Jan 2010, 6:22 am
The RPT has stated in some decisions that it sees the RRO as a punishment (see for example the decision of the Midland RPT in Jennings & Others v Malik) but when calculating how much to return to the occupiers it tends to look at the condition of the property and its reduced value to the tenants due to its failure to be in a condition which it would need to be in to obtain a property licence. [read post]
14 Jan 2010, 6:22 am
The RPT has stated in some decisions that it sees the RRO as a punishment (see for example the decision of the Midland RPT in Jennings & Others v Malik) but when calculating how much to return to the occupiers it tends to look at the condition of the property and its reduced value to the tenants due to its failure to be in a condition which it would need to be in to obtain a property licence. [read post]
15 Sep 2009, 1:26 pm
Supreme court case of Hudson v. [read post]
4 Dec 2024, 3:50 pm
Demonstrators on each side of United States v. [read post]
23 Mar 2021, 1:20 pm
If the Supreme Court overturns Roe v. [read post]
30 Oct 2008, 5:33 pm
It's to be expected, especially since we sort of did it ourselves, but folks with irons in the fire are positioning themselves in advance of next Monday's oral argument in Wyeth v. [read post]
11 Sep 2019, 6:35 am
But Pennsylvania state law seems to follow the Richardson line of reasoning in, Philadelphia Electric Co. v. [read post]
