Search for: "In re T. W." Results 7481 - 7500 of 8,740
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Aug 2009, 5:35 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Think Tank Global Week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com]   Highlights this week included: US: America’s Affordable Health Choices Act : House Energy & Commerce Committee OKs 12-year data exclusivity for biotech drugs (Patent Baristas) (Patent Docs) (FDA Law Blog) (PatentlyBIOtech) (GenericsWeb)   General Pharmaceutical patent settlements under fire on both sides of the Atlantic (GenericsWeb) Biotechnology… [read post]
5 Aug 2009, 1:01 am
To this, Geithner responded:[W]e can't make these judgments yet about what exactly it's going to take and we're going to get there. [read post]
5 Aug 2009, 12:42 am
Die Frage würde sich erst stellen, wenn die Strafe für den Beschwerdeführer zu beanstanden wäre. [read post]
4 Aug 2009, 12:36 am
Judiciary - and the list won't be final until all has been signed and digested, so to speak.) [read post]
3 Aug 2009, 6:18 am
CIPO launches ‘promoting respect for IP rights’ (Michael Geist) Can’t stop, won’t stop: CIPO changes section 45 procedures (Canadian Trademark Blog) Copyright, fair dealing, satire and parody: some background (David Akin’s On the Hill)   China New red dawn in patents: More Chinese than foreign companies filed invention patents (IP Dragon) Copyright infringement and the end of the world (China Hearsay) China patents work and… [read post]
29 Jul 2009, 7:00 am
The new scope of the exception after Marshall is best summed up by the following passage from Marshall: "when one court is exercising in rem jurisdiction over a res, a second court will not assume in rem jurisdiction over the same res. [read post]
28 Jul 2009, 11:27 pm
The Court of Appeals didn't buy the government's argument: [W]e conclude that the Red Cross website evidence is not intrinsic to the Salvation Army scheme. [read post]
28 Jul 2009, 9:15 pm
And if you’re a wealthy man and you don’t pay up, we’ll be seeing you on the next edition of Lockup rooming with the guy with Swastika tatoo on his face. [read post]
28 Jul 2009, 5:54 am
"Der Beschwerdeführer hat diese Einkünfte nach Ansicht des Bundesgerichts auch verheimlicht, indem er den Betreibungsbeamten nicht darüber aufklärte, dass er für die A-AG und die B-AG arbeitete und er Gegenleistungen für seine Arbeitstätigkeit erhielt, sondern nur… [read post]
27 Jul 2009, 5:45 pm
" In re Donaldson Co., 16 F.3d 1189, 1195 (Fed. [read post]