Search for: "In the Matter of: Brown" Results 7481 - 7500 of 9,180
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Jun 2010, 12:58 pm by law shucks
No matter where you are, Hiring Partner has good advice from the schoolyard once again for dealing with new hires. [read post]
27 Jun 2010, 9:13 am by INFORRM
If a mere police investigation report can be analogized to high level government matters that should be protected by exemptions to disclosure, then there is latitude for other government agencies to shield their reports in a similar matter”. [read post]
27 Jun 2010, 4:54 am
In the circumstances, some of the canister sales infringed that provision, while others did not.Says the IPKat, in reaching his decision on the s.7(2) point, the judge found support (at para.70) from a decision of the European Patent Office's Legal Board of Appeal in Case J19/87 Burr-Brown /Assignment [1988] EPOR 350 to the effect that"I... an assignment of an invention and a patent application from A to B with a covenant of further assurance was sufficient to entitle B to claim… [read post]
26 Jun 2010, 3:00 am by LindaMBeale
There will be a one-time audit of the Fed, but no full audit of interest rate decisions and other matters. [read post]
25 Jun 2010, 10:47 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Discovery limited in the way we propose can address the matter while protecting everyone’s interests. [read post]
24 Jun 2010, 3:16 pm by Andrew Raff
Purely as a matter of judicial crafting and analysis, I found the court's order to be extremely cursory. [read post]
24 Jun 2010, 1:35 pm by law shucks
(These are the counsel whose names appeared on the respective parties’ key briefings: YouTube’s motion for summary judgment and Viacom’s motion for summary judgment) We keep saying it: the order in which names appear on filings actually matters. [read post]
23 Jun 2010, 2:50 am by NL
(The Knowsley argument, paralleling the finding on assured tenants on Knowsley Housing Trust v White, link to our report) ii) Brent v Knightley was wrongly decided, such that the right to apply under s.85 Housing Act 1985 survived the (ex) tenant's death iii) Such a right to apply is a possession under article 1, Protocol 1 of the European Convention on Human Rights iv) To hold that the right to apply did not survive death would be in breach of Art 1 Protocol 1 v) the deceased person had an… [read post]
23 Jun 2010, 2:50 am by NL
(The Knowsley argument, paralleling the finding on assured tenants on Knowsley Housing Trust v White, link to our report) ii) Brent v Knightley was wrongly decided, such that the right to apply under s.85 Housing Act 1985 survived the (ex) tenant's death iii) Such a right to apply is a possession under article 1, Protocol 1 of the European Convention on Human Rights iv) To hold that the right to apply did not survive death would be in breach of Art 1 Protocol 1 v) the deceased person had an… [read post]
22 Jun 2010, 10:54 pm by Jeff Gamso
  The reality is that the aristrocrats abused the peasants no matter what their assurances to the contrary. [read post]
22 Jun 2010, 11:17 am by Steven Jensen
Wagner published the book Bending Science: How Special Interests Corrupt Public Health Research, addressing the very same subject matter. [read post]
21 Jun 2010, 8:45 am by Stephen Albainy-Jenei
Today’s post comes from Guest Barista Scott Conley, a registered patent agent in Frost Brown Todd’s Cincinnati office. [read post]