Search for: "Kennedy v. State"
Results 7481 - 7500
of 8,225
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Jun 2008, 11:36 am
Kennedy, No. 07-77 In a case concerning section 5 of the Voting Rights Act of 1965, the Court rules that a covered state need not obtain fresh preclearance required by section 5 in order to reinstate an election practice prevailing before the enactment of an election law struck down by the state's supreme court. [read post]
2 Jun 2008, 8:14 am
Souter and Ruth Bader Ginsburg joined in full and in which Justice Thomas joined in part in United States v. [read post]
2 Jun 2008, 7:24 am
Today's opinion in United States v. [read post]
2 Jun 2008, 7:12 am
Today’s opinion in United States v. [read post]
2 Jun 2008, 4:25 am
Cuellar was driving a Volkswagen Beetle south on State Highway 77 in Texas, approximately 100 miles from the Mexican border. [read post]
2 Jun 2008, 4:21 am
" Chief Justice Roberts and Justices Breyer, Kennedy, and Alito dissented, with Justices Alito and Breyer writing dissents: Justice Alito rests on a "fair[] read[ing]" of the money laundering law and Justice Breyer adds that the Sentencing Commission can solve any unfairness arising from the ambiguity under its authority to avoid sentencing disparity. [read post]
1 Jun 2008, 12:56 pm
This sense of principle is illustrated by Ronald Dworkin's example of the principle that no one should be allowed to profit from their own wrong, drawn from the case of Riggs v. [read post]
30 May 2008, 6:13 pm
Thomas Haymore writes on SCOTUSblog: With a â [read post]
30 May 2008, 8:59 am
Kennedy, arguing that the "larger moral" in the case is that "[t]he feds should be extra-cautious about messing with state and local governments' structure. [read post]
30 May 2008, 8:57 am
United States (1983), and Young v. [read post]
30 May 2008, 4:50 am
The Court handed down Riley v Kennedy, 07-77, this week. [read post]
30 May 2008, 2:28 am
"
State v. [read post]
29 May 2008, 3:52 pm
One of the trickier parts of the "evolving standards of decency" analysis in Kennedy v. [read post]
29 May 2008, 11:25 am
Kennedy, No. 07-77 "In a case concerning section 5 of the Voting Rights Act of 1965, the Court rules that a covered state need not obtain fresh preclearance required by section 5 in order to reinstate an election practice prevailing before the enactment of an election law struck down by the state's supreme court. [read post]
29 May 2008, 6:55 am
Humphries, and Gomez-Perez v. [read post]
28 May 2008, 9:41 pm
Supreme court, the case of Smith v. [read post]
28 May 2008, 1:47 pm
§ 1981, and Gomez-Perez v. [read post]
27 May 2008, 12:42 pm
United States, which addressed the proposed forcible administration of anti-psychotic drugs to a mentally ill defendant to render that defendant competent for trial. [read post]
27 May 2008, 11:43 am
Supreme Court decision in Davis v. [read post]
