Search for: "Key v State"
Results 7481 - 7500
of 22,286
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Apr 2014, 2:43 pm
Court H.R., Liberty and Others v. the United Kingdom, 1 July 2008, no. 58243/00, § 62 and 63; Rotaru v. [read post]
3 Mar 2015, 8:58 am
Given that the key question is what, if anything, Congress meant by an exchange “established by the State,” one might think the definition of “State” would be relevant. [read post]
8 May 2020, 11:53 am
Hallman v. [read post]
13 Feb 2020, 6:09 am
” Cuozzo Speed Techs., LLC v. [read post]
14 Dec 2020, 11:52 am
On 27 November 2020, the UK Supreme Court handed down judgment in the landmark case of Halliburton v Chubb [2020] UKSC 48, which has been keenly awaited by the international arbitration community. [read post]
17 Apr 2018, 3:05 pm
In South Dakota v. [read post]
24 Apr 2007, 6:51 am
Payne v. [read post]
7 Feb 2022, 3:00 am
Having reviewed the case law, the key issues for Meade J to assess were the proper characterisation of the result of the proceedings before Marcus Smith J, the reasons for the result, who was the “winner”, and when. [read post]
26 Oct 2006, 4:30 am
Next week the Supreme Court will hear Philip Morris USA v. [read post]
19 Mar 2024, 5:52 am
Additional Protocol I, article 50(3); ICTY Prosecutor v. [read post]
4 Sep 2012, 4:54 am
A better example is United States v. [read post]
19 Feb 2018, 2:38 pm
The defendants allegedly conducted what they called “information warfare against the United States,” with the stated goal of “spread[ing] distrust towards the candidates and the political system in general…” U.S. v. [read post]
22 Nov 2011, 8:11 pm
A great example of how the UCCJEA can serve to protect the absent parent is found in Razo v. [read post]
15 Jul 2012, 9:05 am
The key to both the Guidelines and the statutory factors is flexibility and the best interest of children. [read post]
3 Dec 2016, 10:02 am
No problem, here is the 124th edition of Never Too Early For Christmas References Never Too Late.Festive Feline Level 100Rocket in the Patents Court: Napp Pharmaceutical v Dr Reddy's and SandozThe case of Napp Pharmaceutical Holdings Limited v (1) Dr Reddy's Laboratories (UK) Limited (2) Sandoz Limited [2016] EWCA Civ 1053 was previously reported on the IPKat here (first instance) and here (interim application). [read post]
13 Sep 2023, 10:38 pm
I disagreed with key parts of her Epic Games v. [read post]
25 Jul 2023, 9:10 am
By Lene Powell, J.D.Parts of the recent controversial ruling in SEC v. [read post]
5 Aug 2015, 10:06 am
In United States v. [read post]
30 Jun 2015, 12:03 am
And who's key to the major question:Can you count to 5? [read post]
27 Dec 2019, 10:04 am
” Key here: the petitioner represented himself: inmate James Dalton Smith filed his Petition for Writ of Certiorari in forma pauperis. [read post]
