Search for: "Legall v. State"
Results 7481 - 7500
of 88,742
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Jan 2023, 6:00 am
New York State Rifle & Pistol Association v. [read post]
27 Jan 2023, 9:30 pm
United States, Sarah Friedman on Hansberry v. [read post]
27 Jan 2023, 12:30 pm
In which the Tenth Circuit illustrates the difference between things states may not legally do (which includes interfering with the interstate transportation of hemp) and things states may do without fear of being sued (which, apparently, includes seizing all your hemp plants at the airport). [read post]
27 Jan 2023, 9:49 am
In Maximillian Schrems v. [read post]
27 Jan 2023, 7:05 am
For example, in the 1994 Appellate Division case Segal v. [read post]
27 Jan 2023, 5:00 am
State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance, 256 A.3d 1145 (Pa. 2021), by reaffirming its previous decision in Gallagher v. [read post]
27 Jan 2023, 1:00 am
In its last judgment of 2022, the Patents Court issued a decision in the case of Oxford University Innovation Ltd v Oxford Nanoimaging Ltd [2022] EWHC 3200 (Pat)). [read post]
26 Jan 2023, 7:45 pm
Supreme Court said it cannot identify the person who in the spring leaked a draft of the opinion that overturned Roe v. [read post]
26 Jan 2023, 6:35 pm
21 states have acted to legalize recreational marijuana, and even more states have legalized the medical use of marijuana. [read post]
26 Jan 2023, 1:59 pm
We have stated this rule in slightly different ways. [read post]
26 Jan 2023, 1:50 pm
The court declared that all complaints in Ukraine v. [read post]
26 Jan 2023, 11:55 am
Comin and Briggs v. [read post]
26 Jan 2023, 11:32 am
He held that plaintiffs have standing to bring a legal challenge, and enjoined implementation of Assembly Bill (AB) 2098 in California. [read post]
26 Jan 2023, 11:29 am
Laster is quite correct when he quotes extensively from prior Delaware Supreme Court decisions stating that “the fiduciary duties of officers are the same as those of directors. [read post]
26 Jan 2023, 9:06 am
An amicus curiae brief submitted by the America First Legal Foundation on behalf of neither party in Students for Fair Admissions v. [read post]
26 Jan 2023, 8:26 am
In this episode of the Diagnosing Health Care Podcast: The Dobbs v. [read post]
26 Jan 2023, 8:00 am
I devoted a chapter to the critique by Paul Carrington not only of Critical Legal Studies as a way of analyzing law, but of the proposition that “crits” should necessarily be welcome within the American legal academy. [read post]
26 Jan 2023, 7:57 am
When we asked it to name three noteworthy opinions of Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg (Question #11), it started off strong: It identified (and correctly summarized) her majority opinion in United States v. [read post]
26 Jan 2023, 7:36 am
Glacier Northwest, Inc. v. [read post]
26 Jan 2023, 6:36 am
State v. [read post]