Search for: "Line v. People"
Results 7481 - 7500
of 13,534
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Sep 2014, 6:20 pm
”[1] In the United States statutes do not exist alone—the sole expression of the power of the people to govern themselves. [read post]
8 Sep 2014, 4:55 am
” Under Santobello v. [read post]
7 Sep 2014, 9:37 pm
In the wake of Judge Posner’s opinion on same-sex marriage in Baskin v. [read post]
6 Sep 2014, 12:51 pm
” Marbury v. [read post]
5 Sep 2014, 7:27 am
Here’s the introduction: In June 2014, the Supreme Court handed down its decision in Riley v. [read post]
4 Sep 2014, 8:01 pm
GLBT people are, as we’ve been recently reminded, a tiny portion of the population. [read post]
4 Sep 2014, 12:58 pm
Russian President Vladimir V. [read post]
4 Sep 2014, 8:17 am
Both were professors at the University of Cambridge but in different departments so that the argument might be characterised as Economics v Land Economy. [read post]
4 Sep 2014, 6:46 am
A major incentive is the franchisee‘s right to hire the people who work for him, and to oversee their performance each day. [read post]
3 Sep 2014, 10:43 pm
” Prosecutor v. [read post]
3 Sep 2014, 8:17 pm
How then to draw the line in close cases, though? [read post]
2 Sep 2014, 2:09 pm
Footnote 5 of Smith v. [read post]
2 Sep 2014, 2:23 am
Esther Salas, in The Federal Trade Commission, Plaintiff, v. [read post]
2 Sep 2014, 2:23 am
Esther Salas, in The Federal Trade Commission, Plaintiff, v. [read post]
1 Sep 2014, 9:23 pm
Esther Salas, in The Federal Trade Commission, Plaintiff, v. [read post]
1 Sep 2014, 9:23 pm
Esther Salas, in The Federal Trade Commission, Plaintiff, v. [read post]
1 Sep 2014, 5:01 am
I also pointed out that all sorts of questions remained to be answered.Last week, in Shankar v. [read post]
31 Aug 2014, 12:49 pm
In dissent in Petrella v. [read post]
30 Aug 2014, 4:37 pm
The 6th Circuit still leaves the courts looking into the minds of religionists and assessing the religiosity of their motivations, when it would be better to be "done with this business of judicially examining other people's faiths" (to quote the last line of my all-time favorite judicial opinion, Justice Jackson dissenting in United States v. [read post]
30 Aug 2014, 5:22 am
Garewal v. [read post]
