Search for: "S. et al"
Results 7481 - 7500
of 29,085
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Nov 2020, 7:30 am
Clínico et al. v. [read post]
19 Oct 2017, 9:48 am
American Future Systems, et al., arose out of the employer’s policy of withholding compensation for any breaks in excess of 90 seconds. [read post]
8 Mar 2021, 5:00 am
In the case of Gass et al., v. 52nd Judicial District, Lebanon County, brought as a class action by the American Civil Liberties Union on behalf three named probationers and any others similarly situated alleging they would be harmed by a new probation policy adopted in September 2019 by court and probation officials in Lebanon County. [read post]
19 Mar 2017, 10:17 pm
In the recent case of Skinner et al v Asciano Services Pty Ltd T/A Pacific National Bulk [2017] FWCFB 574 the Full Bench found that an employer breached its obligation to explore redeployment options under s.389(2) of the Fair Work Act 2009 after making 7 of its employees redundant without properly considering job swaps and voluntary redundancies with other employees. [read post]
8 Mar 2021, 5:00 am
In the case of Gass et al., v. 52nd Judicial District, Lebanon County, brought as a class action by the American Civil Liberties Union on behalf three named probationers and any others similarly situated alleging they would be harmed by a new probation policy adopted in September 2019 by court and probation officials in Lebanon County. [read post]
29 May 2019, 5:35 am
Petrohawk et al, a jury will have to sort out the answer. [read post]
29 Oct 2019, 9:22 am
Wistron Corp. et al., No. [read post]
23 Sep 2015, 10:27 am
Nanchuan Minerals Group Co., Ltd. et al – United States District Court – Western District of Pennsylvania – September 18th, 2015) is an antitrust action in which the plaintiff alleges that the defendant’s conspired to control the supply and fix the price of refractory grade bauxite (RGB) sold between 2003 and 2009. [read post]
16 Apr 2010, 11:03 am
See, Ex Parte Chefalas et al, Appeal No. 2009012658, Ex Parte Yamanaka et al, Appeal No. 2009010948, Ex Parte Gassen et al, Appeal No. 2009008147, Ex Parte McCabe, Appeal No. 2009013024, Ex Parte Selep et al, Appeal No. 2009008213, Ex Parte Martin et al, Appeal No. 2009011586, Ex Parte Tosey, Appeal No. 2009007299, Ex Parte Van Doorn, Appeal No. 2009011085, Ex Parte Sohraby et al, Appeal No.… [read post]
26 Sep 2018, 6:38 am
Daimler, AG et al – United States District Court – Eastern District of Texas – September 25th, 2018) involves a products liability claim. [read post]
17 Apr 2019, 10:12 am
Conaco, LLC et al – United States District Court – Southern District of California – April 16th, 2019) involves a claim by the plaintiff that the defendant allegedly stole jokes and used it on his late night television show. [read post]
24 Oct 2010, 11:24 am
., et al., Case No. 113-2010 CD (Pa. [read post]
26 Apr 2012, 10:31 am
&S., Inc., et al. is a recent New York asbestos exposure case. [read post]
28 Jul 2017, 8:57 am
Escobar et al. [read post]
9 Jul 2009, 1:59 am
William Case et al., Docket No. [read post]
28 Jul 2017, 8:57 am
Escobar et al. [read post]
31 Oct 2018, 5:14 am
Apache Corporation et al. [read post]
6 Dec 2013, 9:51 am
On November 25, 2013, the jury in TQP Development, LLC v. 1-800-Flowers.com, et al., U.S.D.C., E.D. [read post]
23 Jun 2019, 6:35 pm
Arena Offshore L P et al – United States District Court – Western District of Louisiana – June 21st, 2019) involves a personal injury claim. [read post]
5 Sep 2022, 8:57 am
Coffee County et al – United States District Court – Southern District of Georgia – August 19, 2022) involves a wrongful death action involving a prisoner who died while in custody. [read post]
