Search for: "STEWART" Results 7481 - 7500 of 11,497
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Jun 2011, 1:42 pm by Philip Thomas
Or, as US Supreme Court Justice Potter Stewart opined, famously employing a different sense when attempting to define obscenity:  “I shall not today attempt further to define the kinds of material I understand to be embraced within that shorthand description; and perhaps I could never succeed in intelligibly doing so. [read post]
14 Jun 2011, 6:58 am by Kelly Phillips Erb
Supreme Court Justice Potter Stewart in Jacobellis v. [read post]
14 Jun 2011, 4:39 am by pete.black@gmail.com (Peter Black)
"Jon Stewart to Appear on ‘Fox News Sunday’" http://j.mp/kG8Yct one for battlestar galactica fans ... [read post]
14 Jun 2011, 2:44 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
 "Where an individual claim of breach of contract arises out of the same facts as an asserted legal malpractice cause of action and does not allege distinct damages, the breach of contract claim is duplicative of the malpractice claim (see Turner v Irving Finkelstein & [*2]Meirowitz, LLP, 61 AD3d 849, 850 [2009]; Garten v Shearman & Sterling LLP, 52 AD3d 207, 207-208 [2008]; Peak v Bartlett, Pontiff, Stewart & Rhodes, P.C., 28 AD3d 1028, 1031 [2006]; see also 76 NY Jur… [read post]
13 Jun 2011, 9:13 pm by Site Administrator
After her release from Alderson Federal Prison Camp, Stewart launched her comeback. [read post]
13 Jun 2011, 3:44 pm
I think that the court's tolerance of procedural -- questionable procedures actually undermined the basis for upholding the death penalty that Potter Stewart and Lewis Powell and I relied on in our controlling opinions back in 1976. [read post]
13 Jun 2011, 11:49 am
 Weiner's apology to Clinton prompted Jon Stewart to ask snarkily: "For what? [read post]
13 Jun 2011, 10:51 am by Scott David Stewart
If you need answers and solutions, contact the Law Offices of Scott David Stewart today and schedule a confidential consultation with an experienced family law attorney. [read post]
12 Jun 2011, 5:40 pm by constitutional lawblogger
Stewart describes her own experiences, including her attendance at a church service at her daughter's school in Manhattan. [read post]
10 Jun 2011, 2:08 pm by Ted Allen
., at Stewart Information Services and Cadiz Inc.) with continuing pay issues (in addition to voting “no” during the advisory vote), it appears that some investors remain reluctant to vote against directors who are not on the compensation committee to express pay concerns. [read post]
10 Jun 2011, 1:42 pm by Scott David Stewart
You can avoid the worry and anxiety associated with financial uncertainty by contacting the Law Offices of Scott David Stewart today. [read post]
10 Jun 2011, 8:24 am by Stefanie Levine
., Partner at Birch, Stewart, Kolasch & Birch, LLP, sent in this article discussing  the decision and possible ramifications. [read post]
10 Jun 2011, 6:44 am by Brian Wolfman
It’s not Elizabeth Warren-specific,” McConnell spokesman Donald Stewart said. [read post]
9 Jun 2011, 7:57 am by Scott David Stewart
Whether virtual assets make up a segment of your marital financial portfolio or not, contact the Law Offices of Scott David Stewart today for the careful asset analysis you need in your divorce. [read post]
9 Jun 2011, 7:29 am by Legal Beagle
Professor Stewart Hamilton (Switzerland - Accountancy) - Emeritus Professor of Accounting and Finance at IMD, Lausanne Switzerland. [read post]
9 Jun 2011, 5:13 am by Lawrence Cunningham
Dodgers (scrivener’s error) * pop superrstar Lady Gaga (accord and satisfaction) * Charlie Sheen / Warner Brothers (conditions, performance, waiver) * “The Sopranos” (novel ideas and restitution) * Rod Stewart (restitution after cessation) * Conan O’Brien / “The Tonight Show” (various) Four stories in the book will be more familiar to veteran contracts teachers, as they already appear in several leadings books: * MLK and BU (bargain or gift,… [read post]
9 Jun 2011, 2:00 am by Stefanie Levine
Mary Hess Eliason, an Associate with Birch Stewart Kolasch and Birch, sent in this article discussing the recent Supreme Court decision of Stanford v. [read post]