Search for: "SUITS v. STATE"
Results 7481 - 7500
of 32,626
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 May 2025, 4:00 am
There's also a doctrinal response, appealing to Train v. [read post]
20 May 2009, 3:33 pm
In AT&T Corp. v. [read post]
27 Apr 2021, 10:46 am
ShareOn Wednesday, the justices will hear argument in PennEast Pipeline Co. v. [read post]
9 Jun 2014, 10:37 am
An industry group brought suit in the D.C. [read post]
9 Jun 2014, 10:37 am
An industry group brought suit in the D.C. [read post]
21 Jul 2011, 1:03 pm
From the State of South Dakota (home to the Badlands, Custer State Park and - of course - Wall Drug) comes a family dispute in the business of selling farm implement equipment. [read post]
20 May 2011, 5:16 am
See Bauman v. [read post]
4 Feb 2019, 7:36 am
Facts: This case (Lombardo et al v. [read post]
16 Aug 2019, 9:21 am
BAKER v. [read post]
20 Jan 2017, 7:41 am
Facts: This case (Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. [read post]
4 Nov 2019, 5:48 am
BAKER v. [read post]
13 Jul 2010, 2:24 am
Rather, the loser’s recourse is to commence a de novo law suit under the national law of its jurisdiction, which in the case of the United States would be a claim under the Anticybersquatting Consumer Protection Act, [specifically, §1125(d) of the Lanham Act]. [read post]
10 Jul 2018, 8:49 am
But the Court in Jones stated that Congress is free to provide a temporary deferral of civil suits while the President is in office. [read post]
14 Sep 2009, 12:41 pm
In Miree v. [read post]
9 Mar 2023, 2:24 pm
" And from today's opinion by New York's intermediate appellate court, Miller v. [read post]
25 Aug 2008, 8:30 pm
New York State Dept. [read post]
20 Jul 2011, 6:57 am
The medical association's motion maintains that the suit, filed in April by egg donor Lindsay Kamakahi, fails to state a claim under antitrust law because it does not contest the basic rationale for the price limits, which were imposed to address ethical concerns. [read post]
23 Oct 2023, 4:44 am
” Emmons v. [read post]
19 Jul 2017, 12:18 pm
The case is Graham v. [read post]
5 Sep 2011, 9:08 am
The Supreme Court eventually struck down the New York law in Simon & Schuster, Inc. v. [read post]
