Search for: "Short v. United States"
Results 7481 - 7500
of 10,141
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Nov 2011, 3:00 am
Barasch v. [read post]
13 Nov 2011, 11:55 am
The uniting thread among the various factions within the Progressive Movement was the view that government in the United States had become systematically corrupt. [read post]
13 Nov 2011, 12:53 am
Boumediene v. [read post]
11 Nov 2011, 11:55 am
In short. [read post]
11 Nov 2011, 5:43 am
Section 1030(e)(2) defines a “protected computer,” in part, as a computer that “is used in or affecting interstate or foreign commerce or communication, including a computer located outside the United States that is used in a manner that affects interstate or foreign commerce or communication of the United States”. [read post]
10 Nov 2011, 11:44 am
United States Jaycees, 468 U.S. 609, 628 (1984).This strikes me as quite wrong. [read post]
10 Nov 2011, 3:54 am
It is established in Strasbourg and domestic jurisprudence that in certain “well-defined circumstances” art 2 will impose “a positive obligation on [state] authorities to take preventative operational measure” to protect the life of an individual (Osman v UK (2009) 29 EHRR 245 at 115). [read post]
9 Nov 2011, 2:40 pm
P. 60(b)”); United States v. [read post]
9 Nov 2011, 4:52 am
United States Jaycees; the Court distinguished Matthews v. [read post]
8 Nov 2011, 12:10 pm
But in an August 2010 decision, the United States Court of Appeals for the DC Circuit ruled that the Knotts holding didn't apply to Jones's case. [read post]
8 Nov 2011, 11:35 am
See United States v. [read post]
8 Nov 2011, 11:23 am
I did some research and found a case from the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit. [read post]
8 Nov 2011, 10:25 am
By creating a World Environment Organization (WEO) as a specialized institution of the United Nations joining together all States with new missions, endowed with significant capacities and able to reinforce actions undertaken by UNEP, 3. [read post]
8 Nov 2011, 6:37 am
(Gillan and Quinton v United Kingdom (2009) The search powers of security personnel at airports were qualitatively different, said the Court. [read post]
7 Nov 2011, 2:12 pm
The Act was codified over two different statutory titles and almost all the cites I have seen to it reference only the public law citation and not the United States Code. [read post]
7 Nov 2011, 3:30 am
Ricci v. [read post]
6 Nov 2011, 7:28 pm
Faragher v. [read post]
6 Nov 2011, 10:30 am
In short, this case did remand the case back to the state court. [read post]
4 Nov 2011, 9:03 pm
The case is United States v. [read post]
3 Nov 2011, 9:12 pm
Finally, recent United States Supreme Court cases Rent-A-Center, West, Inc. v. [read post]
