Search for: "State v. C. S."
Results 7481 - 7500
of 37,717
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Apr 2011, 9:00 am
ARTICLE V (1) Extradition shall not be granted if: (a) the person sought would, if proceeded against in the territory of the requested Party for the offense for which his extradition is requested, be entitled to be discharged on the grounds of a previous acquittal or conviction in the territory of the requesting or requested Party or of a third State; or (b) the prosecution for the offense for which extradition is requested has become barred by lapse of time according to the law… [read post]
24 May 2011, 9:00 am
ARTICLE V (1) Extradition shall not be granted if: (a) the person sought would, if proceeded against in the territory of the requested Party for the offense for which his extradition is requested, be entitled to be discharged on the grounds of a previous acquittal or conviction in the territory of the requesting or requested Party or of a third State; or (b) the prosecution for the offense for which extradition is requested has become barred by lapse of time according to the law… [read post]
16 Dec 2010, 6:30 am
Strehler, 262 Va. 617, 628 (2001)(assumed duty); Infant C. v. [read post]
21 Nov 2007, 4:07 pm
Denmark, paragraph 45; and Case C-24/00 Commission v. [read post]
2 Dec 2019, 2:30 am
Patel v Secretary of State for the Home Department; Secretary of State for the Home Department v Shah, heard 7 May 2019. [read post]
31 Jan 2011, 3:05 am
Eazypower Corp. v. [read post]
19 Mar 2009, 5:37 am
" United States v. [read post]
8 Sep 2008, 9:58 am
US v. [read post]
11 Sep 2011, 5:08 am
State v. [read post]
30 May 2012, 5:30 am
State v. [read post]
14 Jul 2010, 7:55 am
United States v. [read post]
30 Oct 2013, 9:36 am
Relying largely on Judge Paul Maloney’s decision in United States v. [read post]
28 May 2012, 1:50 am
High Court (Queen’s Bench Division) O’Connell v Viridian Housing [2012] EWHC 1389 (QB) (25 May 2012) Lewis v Commissioner of Police of the Metropolis & Ors [2012] EWHC 1391 (QB) (25 May 2012) High Court (Chancery Division) HM Revenue and Customs v The Football League Ltd & Anor [2012] EWHC 1372 (Ch) (25 May 2012) High Court (Administrative Court) Shanmuganathan, R (on the application of) v Secretary of State for the Home… [read post]
17 Jun 2021, 6:26 am
As the claimant sought a range of remedies, at least some of which should only be available in a court with ‘full’ jurisdiction (as per the Court’s decision in Case C-194/16 Bolagsupplysningen, para 48), he needed to rely on the Court’s ‘centre of interests’ criterion to seize the Polish courts. [read post]
29 Jun 2019, 3:12 pm
Penalty Provisions of Federal Gun Law Struck Down In the opening line of a June 24, 2019 ruling in United States v. [read post]
4 Jul 2012, 7:30 am
State v. [read post]
27 Jun 2012, 1:43 pm
See Bates v. [read post]
24 Dec 2008, 8:56 am
State v. [read post]
14 Apr 2009, 9:59 am
But Rule 83.3(c)(3) makes special provisions for attorneys for the United States (e.g., the U.S. [read post]
3 Apr 2008, 1:13 pm
United States v. [read post]
