Search for: "State v. Doctor" Results 7481 - 7500 of 9,600
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Mar 2011, 2:00 am by John Day
 Plaintiff brought an action for personal injury and wrongful death against the truck driver and against a doctor who had prescribed two medications to the truck driver. [read post]
1 Mar 2011, 4:47 am by Eric Turkewitz
New York has successfully been doing this for almost 200 years for verdicts that are unreasonable, since Chief Judge James Kent wrote the following in Coleman v. [read post]
27 Feb 2011, 12:08 pm by Don Cruse
The Court, through an opinion by Justice Medina, held that the 120-day time limit on serving an expert report in a medical-malpractice case was not tolled when the doctor had lost his license, “probably left the state,” and his “whereabouts are unknown. [read post]
26 Feb 2011, 10:34 am
Honda (holding that a state regulation mandating passenger side airbags was preempted by a federal regulation that did not require them). [read post]
25 Feb 2011, 7:37 am
In June 2010, the First Circuit of the State of Louisiana Court of Appeal reversed and remanded the case of Lena Hebert et al. v. [read post]
25 Feb 2011, 3:00 am by Steve Lombardi
State sanctioned apology-lies hide from our view those doctors that genuinely wish to apologize, while encouraging those that aren’t sorry to lie. 4. [read post]
24 Feb 2011, 1:49 pm by Bexis
  The parties were a doctor, who prescribed a veritable cornocopia of drugs to the decedent, and the pharmacy. [read post]
23 Feb 2011, 11:35 am
(b) The occasional rendering of services in this state by a physician if the physician: (I) Is licensed and lawfully practicing medicine in another state or territory of the United States without restrictions or conditions on the physician's license; (II) Does not have any established or regularly used medical staff membership or clinical privileges in this state; (III) Is not party to any contract, agreement, or understanding to provide services in this… [read post]
23 Feb 2011, 3:59 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
" "Turning to defendant's conduct after he learned of the title defects, as stated in Logalbo v Plishkiii, Rubano & Baum, supra: While the issue of whether certain conduct constitutes legal malpractice normally requires a factual determination to be made by a jury . . , , a plaintiff will be entitled to summary judgment in a case where there is no conflict at all in the evidence, the defendant's conduct fell below any permissible standard of due care, and… [read post]
23 Feb 2011, 3:47 am by Russ Bensing
That’s one of the issues on appeal from the 8th District’s decision last December in State v. [read post]
22 Feb 2011, 4:12 pm
Resource: Johnson and Johnson v Superior Court, Court of Appeal Second District, January 20, 2011 [read post]