Search for: "State v. Downs" Results 7481 - 7500 of 40,293
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 May 2013, 12:30 am by Rumpole
 Legally, the Supreme Court decided Roe v. [read post]
21 Mar 2021, 7:27 am by Anastasiia Kyrylenko
C-64/20 UH v An tAire Talmhaíochta Bia agus Mara, Éire and An tArd-Aighne concerned the role that a Member State’s court has in case this Member State fails to transpose a Directive into national law. [read post]
11 Apr 2021, 4:40 pm by INFORRM
On 30 March 2021,  Mann J handed down what is likely to be his final “phone hacking” judgment in ruling in Various Claimants v MGN [2021] EWHC 771 (Ch) regarding amendments to some of the Claimants’ statements of case and costs. [read post]
3 May 2012, 5:47 am by Haskell Murray
  Benefit corporations are formed under the state law of one of the seven states that have passed benefit corporation statutes (California, Hawaii, Maryland, New Jersey, New York, Vermont and my state of residence - Virginia.) [read post]
11 Feb 2012, 12:29 pm by Matthew Flinn
AT v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2012] EWCA Civ 42 – Read Judgment The Court of Appeal has upheld a challenge to a control order on the basis that the person subject to the order (‘the controllee’) had not been given sufficient information about the case against him. [read post]
20 Sep 2011, 7:23 am by Marcia Oddi
The decision presumably will be on whether or not to grant the motion for rehearing ... [read post]
14 Jun 2018, 8:26 am by Kent Scheidegger
  The Court did not strike down button bans but said, "the State must be able to articulate some sensible basis for distinguishing what may come in from what must stay out. [read post]
24 Oct 2014, 8:30 am by Dan Ernst
Evans’s understanding of equality in United States v. [read post]
30 Apr 2012, 1:37 pm by Michael M. O'Hear
So, the question in Chaidez seems to boil down to whether Padilla announced a new rule or merely applied the basic ineffective assistance test of Strickland v. [read post]