Search for: "State v. Law"
Results 7481 - 7500
of 173,904
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Oct 2023, 4:59 am
His decision on circuit in United States v. [read post]
5 Oct 2023, 4:28 am
We must also emphasize that the Peruvian State has the obligation to guarantee, with immediate effect, the right to health for all Peruvians. [read post]
5 Oct 2023, 3:37 am
(Some states do require them depending on the total number of hours worked; mine, however, does not.) [read post]
5 Oct 2023, 3:20 am
The US Supreme Court case Carpenter v. [read post]
5 Oct 2023, 1:01 am
In Chisholm v. [read post]
5 Oct 2023, 12:00 am
Construction Ltd., 2023 BCSC 1685 appeared first on Construction Law Canada. [read post]
4 Oct 2023, 10:00 pm
In that case, the court enjoined a Michigan state law that sought to freeze and abolish a customer fee because the law did not adequately safeguard against “confiscatory rates” or ensure a “fair and reasonable rate of return on investment” as required by the constitution. [read post]
4 Oct 2023, 9:05 pm
The centrality of individual rights is also clear in many privacy laws, including Europe’s General Data Protection Regulation, U.S. state privacy laws, and proposed federal legislation. [read post]
4 Oct 2023, 4:30 pm
Similarly, in Secretary of State for the Home Department v TLU [2018] 4 WLR 101, [2018] EWCA Civ 2217 (15 June 2018) [h/t Inforrm] Gross LJ held that, for the purposes of common law and data protection claims, the wife and child of a person whose data had been inadvertently published were also identifiable, even though they had a different surname, and their relationship could only be derived from extraneous data ([31], [39]). [read post]
4 Oct 2023, 3:02 pm
USA (Bristol Bay Pebble Mine; Clean Water Act; state sovereignty) Four petitions for certiorari were denied on 10/2/2023: Bird Industries, Inc. v. [read post]
4 Oct 2023, 12:46 pm
On October 3, the second morning of its new term, the Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS) heard oral arguments in the case of Consumer Financial Protection Bureau v. [read post]
4 Oct 2023, 9:34 am
That means that the addresses can be omitted if, e.g., data protection laws do not allow their publication or if they are not available (Rule 17(2)(v) Regulations). [read post]
4 Oct 2023, 8:30 am
Read the opinion The post JOSE GONZALEZ-RUPERTO v. [read post]
4 Oct 2023, 8:00 am
” (Blair v. [read post]
4 Oct 2023, 7:54 am
See United States v. [read post]
4 Oct 2023, 7:29 am
Trump, Case No.: 1:23-cv-03773 (civil removal proceedings) Trump notice of appeal to 2nd Circuit Court of Appeals (July 28, 2023) Order and opinion denying Trump motion to remove and granting State of New York motion to remand (July 19, 2023) Order regulating removal evidentiary hearing (June 23, 2023) State of New York memorandum of law in support of its reply in support of its motion to remand (June 23, 2023) Joint letter in agreement on procedures and evidence at… [read post]
4 Oct 2023, 6:47 am
Law Art. [read post]
4 Oct 2023, 6:30 am
It did not review a challenge to changes to agricultural laws that sparked nation-wide protests for months, and is only now hearing a challenge to the alteration of the federal status of one Indian state that was enacted in 2019. [read post]
4 Oct 2023, 6:06 am
While the Second Circuit noted in its decision in U.S. v. [read post]
4 Oct 2023, 6:00 am
The Parties Settle a Complaint of Sex Discrimination in Employment The case of L.C.C. v. [read post]
