Search for: "State v. Light" Results 7481 - 7500 of 26,003
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Sep 2010, 8:33 am by Matt C. Bailey
Although individual inquiries would be necessary to determine whether the class members were damaged by the policies, the Court believes most of these individual inquiries are manageable in light of the size of the class.See Lopez v. [read post]
26 Feb 2009, 8:06 am
  You can download the opinion here:  Ysursa v. [read post]
3 Oct 2016, 6:48 am
The defendant also stated that he knew that Garcia did not have a job and that he basically sold drugs for a living.People v. [read post]
8 Mar 2019, 10:46 am by David Greene
This history also attains greater relevance in light of Justice Thomas’s recent troubling call for the U.S. [read post]
5 Jul 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
  Matter of DeWolf v WayneCounty 2024 NY Slip Op 03531 Decided on June 27, 2024 Appellate Division, Third Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. [read post]
5 Jul 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
  Matter of DeWolf v WayneCounty 2024 NY Slip Op 03531 Decided on June 27, 2024 Appellate Division, Third Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. [read post]
4 Feb 2009, 12:25 am
We agree with the defendant that the evidence at trial, viewed in the light most favorable to the prosecution (see People v Contes, 60 NY2d 620), was legally insufficient to establish that he acted with the culpable mental state of depraved indifference to human life at the time he collided with the complainants' vehicles and, thus, did not support his conviction of assault in the first degree (see Penal Law § 120.10[3]; People v Feingold, 7 NY3d… [read post]
21 Aug 2008, 10:06 pm
Propaganda is probably too light of a term to describe this piece of propaganda. [read post]
1 Oct 2021, 5:59 am by Michael C. Dorf
By effectively telling Florida that there was no time left to conduct a new recount in light of Section 5 of the Electoral Count Act, the Bush v. [read post]