Search for: "Test Plaintiff"
Results 7481 - 7500
of 21,971
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Sep 2014, 12:47 am
(workers-compensation.blogspot.com)BP and plaintiffs reach Gulf oil spill settlement (workers-compensation.blogspot.com)Federal judge rules proof of direct causation unnecessary for BP oil spill claimants (workers-compensation.blogspot.com) [read post]
29 Oct 2013, 7:47 pm
For example, in a products liability case in Hollywood, a plaintiff and their attorney may need to prove that a product had a specific technical flaw that led to a fire or an injury. [read post]
21 Sep 2016, 4:44 am
On December 1, the Department of Labor’s new salary test for exempt employees is set to take effect, raising the salary level to qualify for certain white collar overtime exemptions from $455 per week to $913 per week. [read post]
12 Feb 2013, 6:14 am
Certain plaintiffs against Kia wanted a separate MDL for Kia-only classes. [read post]
18 Jun 2013, 6:42 am
Most notably, insurance companies invariably devalue the character, or lack thereof, of the plaintiff which is just an unbelievably critical value marker. [read post]
2 Jul 2014, 1:33 am
According to a Business Report piece, Christiaan Schoeman, a consultant at Sterling-Rand, said this shortly after the judgement:“We will pay until the last available resources have been exhausted because the evidence provided by the plaintiff has been found to be true and accurate. [read post]
14 Oct 2021, 6:32 am
Plaintiff worked for Mobile Life. [read post]
23 May 2016, 4:27 am
In an FLSA motion for summary judgment, a plaintiff must prove both “that he or she performed work for which he or she was not properly compensated,” … and that the employer had actual or constructive knowledge of that overtime. [read post]
21 Sep 2016, 4:44 am
On December 1, the Department of Labor’s new salary test for exempt employees is set to take effect, raising the salary level to qualify for certain white collar overtime exemptions from $455 per week to $913 per week. [read post]
7 Apr 2023, 3:40 am
— via Evil HR Lady, Suzanne Lucas Employees who self-destruct — via Employment & Labor Insider A CBD user drug tests positive. [read post]
5 Oct 2021, 12:37 pm
” [This might be a survey problem: some plaintiffs have done better with survey evidence.] [read post]
13 Jul 2021, 10:01 am
Under the correct First Amendment test, Clearview may not ignore BIPA, because there is a close fit between BIPA’s goals (protecting privacy, speech, and information security) and its means (requiring opt-in consent). [read post]
28 Aug 2013, 12:29 pm
“It’s a hard test,” he adds. [read post]
2 Nov 2012, 6:08 am
Since the statute is relatively new, only a handful of suits have tested the anti-SLAPP statute. [read post]
31 Jan 2014, 12:39 pm
To obtain compensation and hold owners liable for injuries, plaintiffs must suffice a legal test by proving that the property owner failed to maintain the premises, or created or failed to remedy unsafe conditions (ex: such as failing to clean in a spill in a grocery store) that were known to the owner. [read post]
2 Nov 2023, 9:40 am
Scientific testing reports can demonstrate product defects as well, and your lawyer can help you obtain these types of reports. [read post]
8 Oct 2014, 7:20 am
"Famous" here is a legal conclusion, not a factual allegation, given that fame is defined using a multifactor test in the statute.http://tushnet.blogspot.com/feeds/posts/default? [read post]
19 Mar 2021, 10:22 am
The test for passing off is set out in Lord Oliver’s judgment in Reckitt & Colman Products Ltd v Borden Inc [1990] 1 WLR 491 and the present case turned on whether the defendants (counterclaimants) had goodwill in the word. [read post]
11 Apr 2018, 8:00 am
Twentieth-century courts widely adopted Blatchford’s “sequence of events” test to determine if the narrative of one work infringed another. [read post]
19 Mar 2021, 10:22 am
The test for passing off is set out in Lord Oliver’s judgment in Reckitt & Colman Products Ltd v Borden Inc [1990] 1 WLR 491 and the present case turned on whether the defendants (counterclaimants) had goodwill in the word. [read post]
