Search for: "US v. Weekes"
Results 7481 - 7500
of 39,097
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 May 2020, 1:29 pm
Patent and Trademark Office v. [read post]
4 May 2020, 9:12 am
On April 20, the justices issued their decision in Ramos v. [read post]
4 May 2020, 6:55 am
4 May 2020, 3:58 am
Patent and Trademark Office v. [read post]
4 May 2020, 12:16 am
Among other precedents, Chertok relied on the First Department’s 2012 opinion in Sullivan v Harnisch in which the court held that a sole-discretion provision in the operating agreement of an investment fund “clearly and unambiguously provided that [the manager] had the sole discretion to determine plaintiff’s ‘Sharing Ratio,’ which would be used to determine his allocation of the bonus pool comprised of 75% of the funds’ profits. [read post]
3 May 2020, 7:58 pm
More cases are expected in the coming week…. [read post]
3 May 2020, 6:30 pm
Retrial win, to panel’s chagrin.United States v. [read post]
3 May 2020, 4:16 pm
Internet and Social Media IP Harbour had a post “TikTok owner use Blockchain evidence in Chinese Courts to prove IP Infringement””. [read post]
3 May 2020, 3:15 am
Neutron – Technology & Marketing Law Blog https://t.co/vDQ9PCWuwY 2020-04-26 Changes Result in the Alberta Electronic Transactions Act Applying to Employment and Other Records https://t.co/n6Elv0mQUN 2020-04-26 Redbox's Terms of Use Fail (OUCH)-Wilson v. [read post]
3 May 2020, 3:15 am
Neutron – Technology & Marketing Law Blog https://t.co/vDQ9PCWuwY 2020-04-26 Changes Result in the Alberta Electronic Transactions Act Applying to Employment and Other Records https://t.co/n6Elv0mQUN 2020-04-26 Redbox’s Terms of Use Fail (OUCH)-Wilson v. [read post]
2 May 2020, 1:07 pm
Brott v. [read post]
2 May 2020, 4:33 am
Akabia judgment.The issue of novelty in light of prior use featured in Floyd LJ's dismissal of Regen Lab's UK appeal in Regen v. [read post]
1 May 2020, 12:32 pm
See, e.g., United States v. [read post]
1 May 2020, 8:05 am
On April 24, the FTC filed a Complaint for a Temporary Restraining Order and Preliminary Injunction in the United States District Court for the Central District of California, in FTC v. [read post]
1 May 2020, 5:49 am
A week later, she tells her employer she has since stopped using heroin, but she has not enrolled in any rehabilitation program. [read post]
1 May 2020, 5:16 am
"Similarly, in Szumigala v Hicksville Union Free School District, 148 AD2d 621, the Appellate Division, citing Cheektowaga v Nyquest, 38 NY2d 137, held that a seniority clause in a Taylor Law agreement violated §2510 of the Education Law when it permitted seniority in different tenure areas to be combined for the purposes of determining seniority with the District for the purposes of layoff.However, in Gee v Board of Educ. of Rochester City Sch. [read post]
1 May 2020, 5:16 am
"Similarly, in Szumigala v Hicksville Union Free School District, 148 AD2d 621, the Appellate Division, citing Cheektowaga v Nyquest, 38 NY2d 137, held that a seniority clause in a Taylor Law agreement violated §2510 of the Education Law when it permitted seniority in different tenure areas to be combined for the purposes of determining seniority with the District for the purposes of layoff.However, in Gee v Board of Educ. of Rochester City Sch. [read post]
1 May 2020, 3:57 am
We rely on our readers to send us links for our round-up. [read post]
1 May 2020, 3:05 am
Now, earlier this week the Delaware Court of Chancery issued a 41-page opinion in Hughes v. [read post]
1 May 2020, 12:17 am
Another week another newsround. [read post]