Search for: "US v. Weekes" Results 7481 - 7500 of 39,097
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 May 2020, 9:12 am by Amy Howe
On April 20, the justices issued their decision in Ramos v. [read post]
4 May 2020, 3:58 am by Edith Roberts
Patent and Trademark Office v. [read post]
4 May 2020, 12:16 am by Peter Mahler
Among other precedents, Chertok relied on the First Department’s 2012 opinion in Sullivan v Harnisch in which the court held that a sole-discretion provision in the operating agreement of an investment fund “clearly and unambiguously provided that [the manager] had the sole discretion to determine plaintiff’s ‘Sharing Ratio,’ which would be used to determine his allocation of the bonus pool comprised of 75% of the funds’ profits. [read post]
3 May 2020, 4:16 pm by INFORRM
Internet and Social Media IP Harbour had a post “TikTok owner use Blockchain evidence in Chinese Courts to prove IP Infringement””. [read post]
3 May 2020, 3:15 am by Barry Sookman
Neutron – Technology & Marketing Law Blog https://t.co/vDQ9PCWuwY 2020-04-26 Changes Result in the Alberta Electronic Transactions Act Applying to Employment and Other Records https://t.co/n6Elv0mQUN 2020-04-26 Redbox's Terms of Use Fail (OUCH)-Wilson v. [read post]
3 May 2020, 3:15 am by Barry Sookman
Neutron – Technology & Marketing Law Blog https://t.co/vDQ9PCWuwY 2020-04-26 Changes Result in the Alberta Electronic Transactions Act Applying to Employment and Other Records https://t.co/n6Elv0mQUN 2020-04-26 Redbox’s Terms of Use Fail (OUCH)-Wilson v. [read post]
2 May 2020, 4:33 am by Sophie Corke
Akabia judgment.The issue of novelty in light of prior use featured in Floyd LJ's dismissal of Regen Lab's UK appeal in Regen v. [read post]
On April 24, the FTC filed a Complaint for a Temporary Restraining Order and Preliminary Injunction in the United States District Court for the Central District of California, in FTC v. [read post]
1 May 2020, 5:49 am by Mansell Law
A week later, she tells her employer she has since stopped using heroin, but she has not enrolled in any rehabilitation program. [read post]
1 May 2020, 5:16 am by Public Employment Law Press
"Similarly, in Szumigala v Hicksville Union Free School District, 148 AD2d 621, the Appellate Division, citing Cheektowaga v Nyquest, 38 NY2d 137, held that a seniority clause in a Taylor Law agreement violated §2510 of the Education Law when it permitted seniority in different tenure areas to be combined for the purposes of determining seniority with the District for the purposes of layoff.However, in Gee v Board of Educ. of Rochester City Sch. [read post]
1 May 2020, 5:16 am by Public Employment Law Press
"Similarly, in Szumigala v Hicksville Union Free School District, 148 AD2d 621, the Appellate Division, citing Cheektowaga v Nyquest, 38 NY2d 137, held that a seniority clause in a Taylor Law agreement violated §2510 of the Education Law when it permitted seniority in different tenure areas to be combined for the purposes of determining seniority with the District for the purposes of layoff.However, in Gee v Board of Educ. of Rochester City Sch. [read post]
1 May 2020, 3:57 am by Edith Roberts
We rely on our readers to send us links for our round-up. [read post]
1 May 2020, 3:05 am by Liz Dunshee
  Now, earlier this week the Delaware Court of Chancery issued a 41-page opinion in Hughes v. [read post]