Search for: "United States v. Place"
Results 7481 - 7500
of 24,127
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Jan 2020, 7:00 am
Steiner v. [read post]
12 Nov 2014, 6:23 am
State v. [read post]
27 Mar 2013, 8:12 am
United States, the now-famous GPS case where a unanimous Court overturned years of practice by holding that placing a GPS monitor on the underside of a suspect's vehicle is a "search" that must be supported by a warrant. [read post]
1 Jul 2022, 6:33 am
United States]. [read post]
6 Mar 2014, 6:14 am
The United States Supreme Court yesterday heard oral argument in Halliburton Co. v. [read post]
11 May 2009, 2:52 am
--Court: United States District Court for the District of OregonOpinion Date: 4/28/09Cite: Precision Automation, Inc. v. [read post]
8 Jul 2016, 9:20 am
”] As the United States Supreme Court has stated, [w]hatever differences may exist about interpretations of the First Amendment, there is practically universal agreement that a major purpose of that Amendment was to protect the free discussion of governmental affairs. [read post]
15 Feb 2019, 9:14 am
In addition, it appears that there were nearly 30 million telephones connected to the phone system in the United States by 1948. 4. [read post]
29 Mar 2007, 12:45 am
Before the district court, Blockbuster asserted that CAFA had reversed the traditional rule that the party seeking removal to federal court bears the burden of establishing federal jurisdiction, citing a recent decision by the United States District Court for the Central District of California, Yeroushalmi v. [read post]
30 Mar 2010, 6:15 am
RICO is codified as Chapter 96 of Title 18 of the United States Code, 18 U.S.C. [read post]
11 Sep 2017, 4:09 pm
A hearing took place on 30 November 2016 and the decision was handed down on 5 September 2017. [read post]
1 Jun 2010, 2:21 pm
United States, 512 U. [read post]
7 Aug 2012, 4:48 am
United States v. [read post]
29 Apr 2018, 3:29 pm
See United States v. [read post]
9 Mar 2021, 7:54 am
In Commonwealth v. [read post]
1 Apr 2008, 9:32 am
Dudas and the United States Patent and Trademark Office and their agents, servants, and employees are permanently enjoined from implementing the Final Rules” Notes: The court made no attempt to carve-out portions of the rules that may be legal. [read post]
2 Apr 2020, 4:10 pm
., v. [read post]
3 Feb 2009, 4:19 am
Robinson v. [read post]
29 Jul 2021, 9:01 pm
The Supreme Court made that clear in Jacobson v. [read post]
7 Oct 2022, 5:50 am
I previously wrote about the latest New York gun law passed after the Court’s ruling in New York State Rifle and Pistol Association v. [read post]
