Search for: "A R C C A Inc" Results 7501 - 7520 of 8,833
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Oct 2009, 4:17 pm by Chuck Becker
• Since 1989, only one other project has received a Section 404(c) veto from EPA. [read post]
19 Oct 2009, 6:14 am
., definitive proxy statement relating to the acquisition of Penton Media, Inc. by Prism Business Media Holdings. [read post]
19 Oct 2009, 4:46 am
: In re Intellectual Property Development Corporation Pty Ltd (not precedential) (TTABlog) TTAB sustains Nike's Section 2(e)(2) opposition to B-MORE for clothing: Nike, Inc v Gregory A Bordes (not precedential) (TTABlog) TTAB reverses section 2(E)(2) refusal of CATALINA ISLAND GRANOLA: goods/place association lacking: In re Zeller (not precedential) (TTABlog) US Trade Marks - Lawsuits and strategic steps Cold War Museum - CAFC holds argument in appeal from THE COLD WAR MUSEUM… [read post]
16 Oct 2009, 3:18 pm
Section 403(r)(6) of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (the Act) (21 U.S.C. 343(r)(6)) requires that a manufacturer of a dietary supplement making a nutritional deficiency, structure/function, or general well-being claim have substantiation that the claim is truthful and not misleading. [read post]
16 Oct 2009, 5:51 am
Given the Hearing Committee's finding that Plainview's authority to render professional services was obtained through fraudulent means-and given that only corporations that are in full compliance with applicable statutory and regulatory authority are entitled to reimbursement (Education Law § 6507(4)(c); Business Corporation Law §1503(d), defendant Plainview was/is ineligible to receive reimbursement for no- fault claims at issue herein. [read post]
16 Oct 2009, 5:00 am
Edward Sell Professor of Business Law, University of Pittsburgh School of Law Donna Nagy, C. [read post]
8 Oct 2009, 6:05 am
Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc (Patent Docs) (Patent Baristas) (GenericsWeb)   General Biotech legislative agenda: healthcare, energy, patents and capital (IP Watch) India: Applying for patents does pay: Wockhardt wins kudos from the Indian government (SPICY IP) US: CAFC ruling in Board of Trustees of the Leland Stanford Junior University et al v Roche Molecular Systems et al - How to lose a patent? [read post]