Search for: "B. R."
Results 7501 - 7520
of 55,772
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 May 2019, 12:40 pm
In this case, the defendant was charged with, in part, unlawful disclosure of an intimate image in violation of Administrative Code of the City of New York § 10-177 [b][1]. [read post]
10 May 2019, 11:37 am
Gerald Godoy v. [read post]
10 May 2019, 10:49 am
Working sessions Q and R. [read post]
10 May 2019, 9:48 am
De Lucia established, and Castillo did not dispute, that De Lucia had custody rights under Italian law, that he was exercising those rights at the time of the removal, and that Castillo’s removal of the children to the United States violated De Lucia’s custody rights.Under Italian Civil Code Article 316, “[b]oth parents are entitled with parental responsibility and they shall exercise it by mutual agreement. [read post]
10 May 2019, 8:53 am
June 27, 2017 (two business days later) – Sprint filed a R.60(b) motion for Relief from Judgment based upon the Federal Circuit’s binding authority “that the patent claims underlying that judgment are invalid as unpatentable under 35 U.S.C. [read post]
10 May 2019, 7:57 am
In re Arkive Information Management LLC, Serial No. 87487874 (May 8, 2019) [not precedential] (Opinion by Judge Michael B. [read post]
10 May 2019, 7:38 am
R. 1:36-3. [read post]
10 May 2019, 7:05 am
Under the guidance, Title VII requirements would not be triggered merely because U.S. personnel provide “market color” – in the form of certain background information regarding pricing and market conditions and trends – so long as those U.S. personnel do not receive transaction-based compensation or exercise client responsibility in connection with those transactions.The Commission also has proposed two alternative exceptions from the requirement in Exchange Act Rule… [read post]
10 May 2019, 7:00 am
CUSTOMS Logo Barred by Sections 2(a) and 2(b) CAFC Affirms TTAB's Shinnecock Smoke Shop Section 2(a) Ruling Would You Have Appealed from this TTAB Trifusal? [read post]
10 May 2019, 5:00 am
Imputation of Conflicts of Interest: General Rule (b) [T]he firm may not knowingly represent a person in the same or a substantially related matter . . . unless: (1) the disqualified lawyer is screened from any participation in the matter and is apportioned no part of the fee therefrom; and (2) written notice is promptly given to the appropriate client to enable it to ascertain compliance with the provisions of this rule. [read post]
10 May 2019, 4:30 am
Connolly: “Outsourcing” a Government Investigation — And How to Avoid It by David B. [read post]
9 May 2019, 9:30 pm
Cardozo School of Law), and Reva B. [read post]
9 May 2019, 2:18 pm
Estamos fregados con gentuza que sabrá el ínclito y supremo jefe de bárbaros Atilas. [read post]
9 May 2019, 9:48 am
" But my guess is that much of the judge's skepticism stems not just from the thinness of the plaintiff's allegations, but from something else—a cautionary tale for law students and lawyers: B. [read post]
9 May 2019, 5:00 am
B. [read post]
9 May 2019, 12:40 am
And when will the government deal with the elephant in the room, namely that it was the poorly worded Building Regs and Approved Document B that opened the door for this sort of cladding to be used? [read post]
8 May 2019, 8:31 pm
"Obscene" is defined in an earlier provision using the Supreme-Court-approved definition of obscenity: (10) "Obscene" means the status of material which: (a) The average person, applying contemporary community standards, would find, taken as a whole, appeals to the prurient interest; (b) Depicts or describes, in a patently offensive way, sexual conduct as specifically defined herein; and (c) Taken as a whole, lacks serious literary, artistic, political, or… [read post]
8 May 2019, 2:45 pm
B. [read post]
8 May 2019, 7:58 am
The draft amendments to the Mortgages and Home Finance: Conduct of Business sourcebook and the Perimeter Guidance manual are contained in Annexes A and B of CP19/17. [read post]
8 May 2019, 4:50 am
R v Del Corro, 2019 ABCA 156 [69] Mr. [read post]
