Search for: "Call v. Heard" Results 7501 - 7520 of 8,365
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Sep 2008, 5:30 pm
09:29 AM September 05, 2008 from twitterrific David Keltner discussing City of Keller v. [read post]
In their submissions to the Expert Group, the Scottish Government and the Lord Advocate had called for appeals to the Supreme Court in criminal cases to be ended altogether, so Salmond was no doubt hoping that this is what the Review Group (headed by Lord McCluskey) would recommend.  [read post]
2 Feb 2020, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
Late last month, the Supreme Court heard oral argument in Espinoza v. [read post]
17 Apr 2022, 1:01 pm by Patricia Salkin
Members of a public body do not have aright to attend meetings remotely but may participate remotely via videoconference only at thediscretion of the public body.Except in the case of executive sessions conducted pursuant to Public Officers Law § 105, the publicbody must ensure that members of the public body can be heard, seen, and identified while the meetingis being conducted, including but not limited to any motions, proposals, resolutions, and any othermatter formally discussed or… [read post]
24 Jan 2011, 7:27 am by Peter McCormick
  Most seriously, he totally botches the description of an extremely important recent case, Chaoulli v. [read post]
3 Jan 2025, 12:35 pm by John Ross
Instead, the case will be heard by a three-judge panel on its already expedited basis later this month. [read post]
27 Nov 2023, 10:27 am by Jason Rantanen
  We have been told by many that the $2.2 billion Intel v. [read post]