Search for: "Childs v. State"
Results 7501 - 7520
of 21,042
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Apr 2014, 11:26 am
Since the Supreme Court ruled that the federal government could no longer refuse to recognize marriages of same-sex couples in United States v. [read post]
16 Feb 2023, 10:21 am
Wilson v. [read post]
16 May 2017, 8:17 am
& K.I.A. v. [read post]
27 Dec 2010, 9:01 pm
State v. [read post]
17 May 2010, 3:55 am
State v. [read post]
27 Jul 2010, 3:33 pm
Solihull Metropolitan Borough Council v Hickin [2010] EWCA Civ 868 Where there are two joint tenants of a secure tenancy, of whom one has left and no longer occupies the property, and the remaining tenant in occupation dies, can that tenant's adult child succeed to the tenancy? [read post]
27 Jul 2010, 3:33 pm
Solihull Metropolitan Borough Council v Hickin [2010] EWCA Civ 868 Where there are two joint tenants of a secure tenancy, of whom one has left and no longer occupies the property, and the remaining tenant in occupation dies, can that tenant's adult child succeed to the tenancy? [read post]
25 May 2009, 5:06 am
However, the Florida Supreme Court has now decided as recently as May 13, 2009, in the case of Embry v. [read post]
3 Nov 2022, 10:52 am
Sichelstiel v. [read post]
10 Jul 2021, 10:02 am
That statute, coupled with the 1981 Minnesota Supreme Court decision in Nice-Petersen v. [read post]
28 Nov 2017, 2:49 am
Denial for miscellaneous arm-twisting reasons – e.g. child support – is bad policy. [read post]
16 Nov 2010, 1:53 pm
Liberty and Justice for Y'all brings word of an important new case from the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals (Cardenas v. [read post]
14 Feb 2008, 11:45 pm
In Flores v. [read post]
5 Mar 2012, 8:13 pm
On February 7, in a 2-1 decision, the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit affirmed a District Court’s decision in Perry v. [read post]
2 Mar 2012, 12:56 pm
V. [read post]
28 Oct 2008, 8:30 pm
Lilieholm v. [read post]
4 Mar 2013, 9:02 am
Bauer v. [read post]
19 Jan 2011, 1:36 am
The authority relied on by the Government included a Court of Appeal decision (R (Secretary of State for the Home Department) v Mental Health Review Tribunal [2002] EWCA Civ 1868 – “the PH case”) and three High Court decisions (R (G) v Mental Health Review Tribunal [2004] EWHC 2193 (Admin), R v Secretary of State for the Home Department) v Mental Health Review Tribunal [2004] EWHC 2194 (Admin) and IT v Secretary of… [read post]
18 Apr 2015, 11:19 am
Nebraska and Pierce v. [read post]
22 Feb 2015, 1:14 pm
Additional Resources: Monfore v. [read post]
