Search for: "Companies A, B, and C" Results 7501 - 7520 of 12,894
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Jun 2013, 1:03 pm by David Kemp
The sentences increases to a seven-year minimum if the firearm is brandished, 924(c)(1)(A)(ii), and to a 10-year minimum if it is discharged, 924(c)(1)(A)(iii). [read post]
16 Jun 2013, 8:09 am by Mark S. Humphreys
Defendant's Showing of Damages In the event that the initial pleading does not control, § 1446(c)(2)(B) provides that removal is proper where a sufficient amount in controversy is supported by a preponderance of the evidence. [read post]
16 Jun 2013, 7:06 am by Barry Sookman
c=homepage-t … Bill C-56 finished Second Reading in the House and was referred to the Standing Committee on Industry, Science and Technology… Myriad: Isolated DNA out, cDNA in http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/PatentlyO/~3/jy7pRx6SyNE/myriad-isolated-dna-out-cdna-in.html … Myriad: Justice Scalia's Concurrence http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/PatentlyO/~3/31ceoMLwmu0/myriad-justice-scalias-concurrence.html … Huge win for Apple at the patent office: key… [read post]
15 Jun 2013, 9:41 am by LindaMBeale
Most of the complexity in the Code stems from two factors--(a) tax expenditures (subsidies) that benefit (substantially, in most cases) particular types of wealthy and business taxpayers lobbied for by those taxpayers and (b) anti-abuse rules necessitated by the clever tax strategies invented by the wealthy taxpayers' (especially corporate and business taxpayers') expensive tax experts. [read post]
14 Jun 2013, 5:05 am by Barry Sookman
c=homepage-t … Bill C-56 finished Second Reading in the House and was referred to the Standing Committee on Industry, Science and Technology… Myriad: Isolated DNA out, cDNA inhttp://feedproxy.google.com/~r/PatentlyO/~3/jy7pRx6SyNE/myriad-isolated-dna-out-cdna-in.html … Myriad: Justice Scalia's Concurrencehttp://feedproxy.google.com/~r/PatentlyO/~3/31ceoMLwmu0/myriad-justice-scalias-concurrence.html … Huge win for Apple at the patent office: key… [read post]
13 Jun 2013, 7:05 pm by Mary Dwyer
Arkansas where (a) the prosecution advises a trial court that the appointment of a particular lawyer in a capital case to represent multiple defendants may create a conflict of interest; (b) the appointed lawyer informs the court that he is financially unable to appoint capitally certified counsel for each of the co-defendants; (c) the court acknowledges these conflicts of interest, but delegates resolution of them to the same lawyer; (d) the conflicted attorney then advocates in a… [read post]
13 Jun 2013, 8:18 am by D. Daxton White
  The following are all bond funds with long “effective maturities”: BlackRock High Yield Municipal Instl BlackRock High Yield Municipal Inv A BlackRock High Yield Municipal Inv C Federated US Government Bond Svc Franklin AL Tax-Free Income A Franklin AL Tax-Free Income C Franklin CA Insured Tax-Free Inc A Franklin CA Insured Tax-Free Inc Adv Franklin CA Insured Tax-Free Inc C Franklin CA Tax-Free Inc Adv Franklin CA Tax-Free Income A Franklin CA Tax-Free… [read post]
11 Jun 2013, 11:00 pm by Kingsley Egbuonu
(b) Restricted access: Authorised access to limited detail on recorded IK that is classified as confidential. [read post]
10 Jun 2013, 11:38 am by Kedar Bhatia
Davila 12-167Issue: Whether the court of appeals erred in holding that any degree of judicial participation in plea negotiations, in violation of Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 11(c)(1), automatically requires vacatur of a defendant’s guilty plea, irrespective of whether the error prejudiced the defendant. [read post]
9 Jun 2013, 3:35 pm by Alexander J. Davie
Regulation A exempts from the registration requirements of the Securities Act of 1933 a public offer or sale of securities in an amount up to $5 million (per year) where the issuer is a U.S. or Canadian entity that is not (a) already a publicly reporting company, (b) a “development stage company” (i.e. a company raising money with no actual business plan) (c) a registered investment company (i.e. a mutual fund or anything similar),… [read post]
6 Jun 2013, 6:00 am by Yosie Saint-Cyr
No person may take a reprisal action against an employee, or direct that one be taken against an employee, because the employee has, in good faith, a) sought advice about making a disclosure from a supervisor, designated officer, chief executive or the Ombudsman, b) made a disclosure or c) cooperated in an investigation under the Act. [read post]