Search for: "David v. David" Results 7501 - 7520 of 19,019
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Jun 2024, 9:30 pm by Karen Tani
  The first posts are by Anne Twitty, David S. [read post]
2 May 2013, 1:45 pm by Rahul Bhagnari, ACLU
On Monday, the ACLU's Chandra Bhatnagar participated in a civil society consultation and briefed the Working Group on four issues: Systemic abuses associated with the U.S. guestworker program, as reflected in our lawsuit, David, et al. v. [read post]
10 Jul 2014, 1:03 am
  David Brophy posted his Katpost on Wilko v Buyology (a recent ruling on whether and, if so, when a trade mark owner can be refused an order that the defendant disclose details of the supplier of infringing goods), so quickly that new guest Kat Rebecca -- who had just written on the same decision -- was literally pipped at the post. [read post]
7 Oct 2013, 3:26 pm
Open source v proprietary software". [read post]
4 Jul 2016, 5:00 am by Howard Friedman
Foreword by David Dinielli; articles by Ira C. [read post]
29 Jan 2014, 5:15 am by David Markus
Three dissented from the ruling, Shelby County v. [read post]
24 May 2024, 9:30 pm by Karen Tani
“On May 16, in celebration of the 70th anniversary of the Supreme Court Brown v. [read post]
19 Jun 2016, 10:00 pm
‚¬ The resulting case,Grand Upright Music Ltd. v. [read post]
26 Jan 2013, 10:42 am
 Here's a review by Katfriend Caroline Ncube: This 164 page IP law thriller has all the hallmarks of a winner; corporate espionage, attempted kidnapping, foiled hits, court room romance, a corrupt Chief Justice and a David v Goliath (Pharma v generic company and public hospitals) battle over patents for a life-saving drug. [read post]
20 Feb 2017, 7:44 am by Anonymous
  In Burwell, Secretary of Health and Human Services v. [read post]
17 Dec 2013, 11:29 am by Dan Ernst
  Anchoring the exhibition, on permanent loan from the philanthropist David M. [read post]
6 Nov 2019, 6:10 am by Gerard N. Magliocca
As I explain in this article that will appear shortly in Rutgers Law Review, Congress has the authority to count states as ratifying an Article V amendment even when those states subsequently rescinded their ratification. [read post]