Search for: "Doe Defendants 1 to 20" Results 7501 - 7520 of 8,963
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Jun 2010, 10:47 am by Rebecca Tushnet
If you decide to survey, be aware: (1) the design is the most critical component. (2) Courts are far more sensitive today than 10-20 years ago to scientific principles; control is the key component though there are others. [read post]
25 Jun 2010, 9:22 am by James Hamilton
Commercial end users using derivatives to hedge risk are exempted from mandatory swap clearing.Corporate GovernanceThe Obama Administration and the G-20 have determined that corporate governance failures, including compensation that encouraged short-term risk taking, were significant causes of the financial crisis. [read post]
24 Jun 2010, 10:55 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Finally it was made public, assuaging some fears—does not require amendment to US law. [read post]
24 Jun 2010, 6:42 am
The 15-20 minute wait for a drug dog was not unreasonable under the totality of the information that the officers had. [read post]
23 Jun 2010, 12:53 pm by MacIsaac
Dutra takes what appears to be the highly technical point that if an offer does not contain the exact wording set out in subrule (1)(c)(iii), it does not come within the definition of an “offer to settle” within the meaning of Rule 37B(1) and, therefore, cannot attract an award of double costs. [19]         Madam Justice Prowse considered both a strict and relaxed interpretation of Rule 37B(1). [read post]
23 Jun 2010, 11:37 am by Heather Young
 That said, the WTC Captive does not want to spend its money on continued defense costs, but rather on compensating these claims. [read post]
22 Jun 2010, 7:55 am by Jeralyn
As to insanity, the Penal Code Article 20 provides: Article 20 .- insanity It is exempt from criminal liability: 1. [read post]
21 Jun 2010, 11:57 am by Ted Allen
”  While this language refers to shareholders in plural, it does not explicitly state that aggregation would be permitted. [read post]
21 Jun 2010, 5:11 am by Susan Brenner
The prosecution opposed the motion, arguing that “`the law does not permit a defendant to present a defense unless the law recognizes that defense. [read post]
20 Jun 2010, 9:31 am by Gene Quinn
Topics to be addressed include: * What does the decision mean? [read post]
20 Jun 2010, 8:31 am by Lawrence Taylor
Let's first take the question of charging defendants with both DUI and .08%. [read post]
19 Jun 2010, 12:35 pm by michael a. livingston
--It is often forgotten that, within pre-1967 Israel, about 15-20 percent of the population (over 1 million people) are Palestinian Arabs. [read post]
18 Jun 2010, 3:00 am by John Day
 ‘The fact that an accident may be freakish does not per se make it unpredictable or unforeseen. [read post]
17 Jun 2010, 6:57 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Q: Does a NAD proceeding risk laches in a later case? [read post]