Search for: "English v. English"
Results 7501 - 7520
of 11,204
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Mar 2012, 4:56 am
So, in relying on Neilson v Harford, (1841), 1 WPC 295, another English case concerning Neilson’s blast furnace, the Court explained that in Neilson “the claimed process included not only a law of nature but also several unconventional steps (such as inserting the receptacle, applying heat to the receptacle externally, and blowing the air into the furnace) that confined the claims to a particular, useful application of the principle. [read post]
21 Mar 2012, 9:11 am
Both the English and French versions of this policy explicitly limit the scope of “political activity” to activities intended to incite a public official to “retain, oppose, or change” a law, policy or decision, i.e. one which already exists. [read post]
21 Mar 2012, 8:40 am
In R.S. v. [read post]
21 Mar 2012, 5:00 am
Supreme Court in Coleman v. [read post]
21 Mar 2012, 5:00 am
Supreme Court in Coleman v. [read post]
20 Mar 2012, 6:22 am
V. [read post]
20 Mar 2012, 3:00 am
Here is the language from Shaffer v. [read post]
20 Mar 2012, 12:05 am
This is a shortened version of an article published by Rosalind English in the Journal of Environmental Law and Management November 2011: Cooperation and Public Goods: an evolutionary perspective on environmental law 23 ELM 278-283 In my 2011 post Why be nice? [read post]
19 Mar 2012, 7:33 am
On February 21, 2012, the US Supreme Court heard oral arguments on the case Taniguchi v. [read post]
19 Mar 2012, 3:30 am
Libel enjoyed a little more attention this week, as Index on Censorship and English PEN launched its final report of the Alternative Libel Project at London’s Inner Temple on 15 March. [read post]
19 Mar 2012, 12:54 am
The Court of Appeal has confirmed that a declaratory award under section 66 of the Arbitration Act can be enforced by the English courts in the same manner as a judgment.In West Tankers Inc v Allianz SpA and another [2012] EWCA Civ 27, the Court of Appeal upheld the first instance decision of Field J in which the court enforced a declaratory arbitral award under s.66 of the Arbitration Act 1996 (see our previous blog here). [read post]
18 Mar 2012, 2:33 pm
Glover also misstates English law. [read post]
18 Mar 2012, 2:10 pm
Kettling caselaw – Austin v. [read post]
18 Mar 2012, 4:49 am
The IPKat thinks that these proceedings sound similar to that in the old English decision of Maxims Ltd v Dye [1977] 1 WLR 1155 (Ch). [read post]
17 Mar 2012, 6:15 am
Enriquez v. [read post]
17 Mar 2012, 3:46 am
Secondly, the drafters have transplanted English and American principles into the guidelines, where they do not always fit, either with each other or with the Chinese political reality (the American public figure doctrine from New York Times v Sullivan for example, carries none of its original weight in a system where party officials are simply not counted as public figures). [read post]
15 Mar 2012, 11:55 am
Earlier this month Judge Birss QC handed down his judgement in the Patents County Court case of Temple Island Collections Limited v New English Teas Limited and Nicholas Houghton. [read post]
15 Mar 2012, 8:04 am
One question (of the many) arising from the watershed that is represented in English and Welsh law by Pinnock is just how far it extends. [read post]
15 Mar 2012, 8:04 am
One question (of the many) arising from the watershed that is represented in English and Welsh law by Pinnock is just how far it extends. [read post]
15 Mar 2012, 5:39 am
Poole, Russell, and Bailey v. [read post]
