Search for: "Hope v. Hope" Results 7501 - 7520 of 23,640
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Jun 2017, 3:22 pm by Arthur F. Coon
  In Sierra Club, appellants essentially took their “best shot” and hoped to set a published precedent achieving their goal of subjecting ministerial vineyard (and other) permit approvals to CEQA and attendant litigation challenges. [read post]
28 Jun 2017, 3:21 pm by Kent Scheidegger
Palin is, of course, a public figure, so under the landmark 1964 precedent of New York Times v. [read post]
28 Jun 2017, 1:11 pm by Kent Scheidegger
Let us hope the court can get back to its real job in capital cases in the coming term. [read post]
28 Jun 2017, 4:24 am by SHG
Not that the forces of tolerance will bother to learn anything more about the case of Masterpeice Cake Shop v. [read post]
27 Jun 2017, 2:58 pm by sarahjaneewart
The dissenting judgments of Baroness Hale and Lord Kerr offer some hope to campaigners, and the appellants will take their case to Strasbourg (despite the earlier case of A, B and C v Ireland, which held that Article 8 rights cannot be interpreted as providing a right to an abortion). [read post]
27 Jun 2017, 11:23 am by Andrew Kent
But the Court’s 2008 decision in Boumediene v. [read post]
27 Jun 2017, 9:00 am by Lyle Denniston
In that new decision, in the case of Trinity Lutheran Church v. [read post]
27 Jun 2017, 8:13 am by Fred Yarger
A plurality of the court, in the 2000 decision Mitchell v. [read post]
27 Jun 2017, 5:02 am by Eugene Volokh
And, you know, if it ever happens to me, I would want somebody to do this for myself, so I’m OK with that, you know, and I guess I just hope she learns her lesson and I hope she takes this as a carrot, and doesn’t do it again. [read post]