Search for: "JAMES V. STATE" Results 7501 - 7520 of 10,691
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Sep 2011, 8:55 am by Viking
The Atlanta Journal-Constitution reports:  Judge (COL) Pohl has recommended a non-capital referral in United States v. [read post]
17 Sep 2011, 11:39 pm by David Kopel
  Commentary During the Ratification PeriodThe Federalist PapersThe Federalist No. 29 (Alexander Hamilton)The Federalist No. 46 (James Madison)Tench CoxeOther FederalistsD. [read post]
17 Sep 2011, 10:44 am by Lovechilde
Under a Supreme Court decision called Printz v. [read post]
16 Sep 2011, 8:39 am by Christine Sellers
The following is a guest post by James Martin, a Collections and Outreach Specialist, in observation of Constitution Day on September 17, 2011. [read post]
16 Sep 2011, 5:01 am by James Edward Maule
Like me, she could not figure out why the taxpayer in Megibow v. [read post]
15 Sep 2011, 2:03 pm by Matt Rita
Then again, if Pennsylvania were to become one of the growing number of states to propose laws against workplace bullying, we could soon see the case of Kevin Malone, et al. v. [read post]
15 Sep 2011, 9:30 am by azatty
June 29, 2011), and State of Florida v. [read post]
14 Sep 2011, 11:15 am by Morris James Delaware
Neikirk is senior counsel at Morris James in Wilmington and a member of its corporate and fiduciary litigation group. [read post]
14 Sep 2011, 10:27 am by Mary L. Dudziak
:Insurrections & Infections: Rethinking the Legal History of Atlanta, 1920-1940 – InmanChair - Robert Baker, Georgia State UniversityPolly Price, Emory University, “Federalization of the Mosquito: Malaria and Public Health In the Southern United States, 1900-1945”Maryan Soliman, University of Pennsylvania, “Racial Equality on Trial in Atlanta during the 1930s”Anders Walker, Saint Louis University, “Scarlett’s Rainbow: Margaret Mitchell,… [read post]
13 Sep 2011, 3:02 pm by SteinMcewen, LLP
Smith (R-TX) on March 30, 2011, the first significant change to the United States patent system has arrived. [read post]
13 Sep 2011, 2:54 am by Melina Padron
Syed, R (on the application of) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2011] EWCA Civ 1059 (07 September 2011) Immigration: Court of Appeal confirms Article 8 ECHR need not necessarily be considered when deciding whether to grant indefinite leave to remain. [read post]