Search for: "JOHN DOE-1"
Results 7501 - 7520
of 14,288
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Nov 2013, 2:35 pm
However, the individual does not necessarily need have to have been personally involved in the violation of the FLSA and does not have to have been involved in supervising the employees on a day-to-day basis as long as he has to have the authority to do so. [read post]
13 Nov 2013, 11:49 am
It depends on what the person does. [read post]
13 Nov 2013, 9:21 am
#1 on his list is, inevitably, Don Quixote. [read post]
13 Nov 2013, 6:23 am
Editor's Note: John F. [read post]
13 Nov 2013, 4:39 am
In re the Tax Liabilities of John Does (SDNY No. 1:13-mc-00377 Nov. 12, 2013). [read post]
12 Nov 2013, 7:39 pm
John Fund, Inc. 13-317Issue: (1) Whether this Court should overrule or substantially modify the holding of Basic Inc. v. [read post]
11 Nov 2013, 11:18 pm
I Sec. 8 Cl. 1. [read post]
11 Nov 2013, 9:01 pm
Moreover, in addition to unanimous Democratic support, the bill also garnered the support of ten Republican senators, including John McCain and Orrin Hatch. [read post]
11 Nov 2013, 1:10 pm
Johns-Manville Corp., 494 A.2d 1088, 1101 (Pa. 1985). [read post]
11 Nov 2013, 12:51 pm
Case-in-point was highlighted in a recent court case, McKeogh v John Doe 1 & Ors [2012]. [read post]
LexisNexis v. Crockett -- Sixth Circuit Performs A Gateway Analysis In Class Arbitration Controversy
11 Nov 2013, 12:14 pm
And, while the agreement does not expressly exclude class arbitration, it does not include it either. [read post]
11 Nov 2013, 10:39 am
Arguing for the federal government will be Assistant to the Solicitor General John F. [read post]
8 Nov 2013, 1:19 pm
My blog for @CenDemTech about why this is v. worrisome. https://www.cdt.org/blogs/gs-hans/0611overbroad-subpoena-airbnb-user-data-smacks-general-warrant … “Does the U.S. [read post]
7 Nov 2013, 10:54 am
Local attorney, John C. [read post]
6 Nov 2013, 6:31 am
John Elwood reviews Monday’s relisted cases. [read post]
6 Nov 2013, 2:10 am
If the answer to 1. is yes, does the same apply in the case where the arbitral tribunal orders a party to limit its claims in proceedings before an EU Member State court? [read post]
5 Nov 2013, 5:31 am
What does that mean? [read post]
5 Nov 2013, 5:31 am
What does that mean? [read post]
4 Nov 2013, 12:31 pm
John C. [read post]
4 Nov 2013, 10:27 am
And, as I argue in an amicus brief filed in the Bond case on behalf of myself, David Golove and John Mikhail, the Court's Necessary and Proper holding in Holland reflected a well-settled and virtually uncontroverted constitutional understanding in all three branches and among commentators long before Holland. [read post]
