Search for: "Levell v. State" Results 7501 - 7520 of 29,839
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Jul 2019, 3:24 pm by Eugene Volokh
" Some trial-level courts of this State have considered the showing necessary for a pseudonymous caption. [read post]
1 Jul 2019, 8:59 am by Kevin Goldberg
I was one of many who traveled (in my case, on foot) to the United States Supreme Court on April 22, 2019 to watch oral arguments in the case of Food Marketing Institute, Inc. v. [read post]
1 Jul 2019, 4:09 am by Peter Mahler
The derivative action as far as I know is authorized by statute and/or common law in every state. [read post]
30 Jun 2019, 8:24 pm by Omar Ha-Redeye
The gage and emblem of this freedom is the sovereign state. [read post]
29 Jun 2019, 7:36 am by Sandy Levinson
” In those states, one must hope that state courts enforcing their own constitutions—the United States constitution is one of only 51 in the entire United States, and the other 50 constitutions all differ from the United States Constitution in important ways—to preclude partisan gerrymandering. [read post]
29 Jun 2019, 4:38 am
The Board drew upon the instructive language of Satava v Lowry, 323 F.3d 805 (9th Cir. 2003): … a combination of unprotectable elements may qualify for copyright protection. [read post]
28 Jun 2019, 4:29 pm by Seyfarth Shaw LLP
As we blogged HERE, this question was answered in the negative by the Illinois Supreme Court in Rosenbach v. [read post]
28 Jun 2019, 1:09 pm by Andrew Pinson
Georgia joined nine other states in filing an amicus brief in support of the appellants in Rucho v. [read post]
28 Jun 2019, 12:08 pm by Thomas Wolf
Extreme gerrymandering was a problem this decade in only a handful of states at the congressional level, and less than a dozen at the state legislative level. [read post]
28 Jun 2019, 11:32 am by Justin Riemer
Justin Riemer is Chief Counsel of the Republican National Committee, which filed an amicus brief in support of the state in Rucho v. [read post]
28 Jun 2019, 11:18 am by Burton A. Padove
For example, the decision not to warn about a specific, known danger for which the government is responsible wouldn’t be the sort of broad social policy the exception was carved out to protect – at both the federal and state level. [read post]